by Dr. Petr Beckmann
Buy it now: amazon
Description
Arguably more than any other book, Einstein Plus Two helped launch the dissident revolution of the 1990s. As a consequence of this book, Beckmann founded Galilean Electrodynamics in 1990, a time when several other dissident journals made their start. Beckmann’s concept of the relativity principle without Einsteinian observer dependence serves as the major unifying theme. It stresses the idea of motion with respect to the local field rather than to the observer of special relativity theory.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
by Tom Bethell, 4393 Embassy Park Drive NW, Washington, DC 20016
Buy it now: amazon
I summarize my 2009 book, Questioning Einstein: Is Relativity Necessary? [1] which in turn simplifies Petr Beckmann’s Einstein Plus Two (1987). [2] Beckmann’s assumption was that the luminiferous medium, which Michelson failed to detect in 1887, is the local gravitational field, which attenuates with distance from the gravitating body. Overwhelmingly, we are in the Earth’s field, which does not rotate with the Earth’s rotation.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
©Walter Babin, November 26, 2011
Abstract:
The reasons for the failure of 20th century theoretical physics are explored from the standpoint of fundamental mathematical and geometric principles. These same principles are then applied towards the establishment of a complete generalization of mechanics and electrodynamics, which will serve as solid foundation for all future advancements in their development and application. There is no appreciable difference between this paper and others written 10 years ago. The formulas are the same as those of classical mechanics and electrodynamics. As such, it can be ignored, but not refuted. This is a qualitative summary. A complete mathematical description is available.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
by Dr. Yefim Bakman, Tel Aviv University (Israel)
Abstract.
Sjödin (1990) and Broekaert (2005) demonstrated that many redundancies of general relativity postulates may be eliminated by introducing a scalar potential instead of four-tensor to represent a gravitational field. The present paper provides further reduction of GR complexity. This is done by addressing physical nature of the phenomena for a static gravitational field. The physical interpretation is based on Einstein’s later conception confirmed by a large amount of published and unpublished manuscripts (Kostro, 2000).
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
by Ivor Catt
121 Westfields, St. Albans AL3 4JR, England, UK
The speed of an electric current has always been a matter for discussion. This went nowhere while it was not realised that the energy delivered from a battery to a lamp travelled at the speed of light. Linking this with the fact that electrons travelling at the speed of light would have infinite mass, a crisis for electricity which became clearer with the advent of pulses in digital electronics was evaded for half a century.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
by J. E. Chappell
J.E. Chappell war der Gründer der Natural Philosophy Alliance, er hat umfangreiche physikalische kritische Arbeite über die Relativitätstheorien, die moderne Physik, die Notwendigkeit des ethischen Denkens in der Physik, sowie über die Geschichte der Unterdrückung der Kritik der Relativitätstheorie veröffentlicht .
Das GOM-Projekt listet mehrere kritische Artikel von John E. Chappell in seiner Dokumentation auf und zitiert Aussagen über Chappells persönlichen Erfahrungen mit der Unterdrückung der Kritik der Relativitätstheorie:
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
von Robert S. Fritzius
Ritz on the Optics of Moving Bodies.
Excerpt, with English translation, from Walter Ritz’s 1908 article
"Critical Researches on the Electrodynamic Theories
of Cl. Maxwell and H.-A. Lorentz“
Robert S. Fritzius – Shade Tree Physics
Installed 1 Oct 1998 – Latest Update 05 Sep 2003
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
by Thierry De Mees
Did Einstein Cheat? How Einstein Solved the Maxwell Analogy Problem
Thierry De Mees
in The General Science Journal – 15 Oct. 2010
Abstract:
Since one century, Gravitation has been in the spell of Einstein’s Relativity Theory. Although during decades, dozens of scientists have provided evidences for the incorrectness of this theory. And often successfully, but without finding a sympathetic ear.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
von Howard C. Hayden
Das GOM-Projekt referiert stichwortartig in seiner Dokumentation drei kritische Arbeiten von Howard C. Hayden: 1991 – Is the velocity of light isotropic in the frame of the rotating earth? In: Physics essays. 4. 1991, S. 361-367.
Albert Einsteins Ur-Kunde 1905 behauptet für die Lichtgeschwindigkeit (C) die Quellenunabhängigkeit (C-U) und die Konstanz (CK) in allen Inertialsystemen (IS). Die meisten Darstellungen der Theorie fordern, daß als Bezugssysteme nur IS benutzt werden: dies legt die Frage nahe, was geschieht, wenn das Bezugssystem nicht inertial ist, sich also in ungleichmäßiger Bewegung befindet? Wird in einem nicht-inertialen System die C-Konstanz ungültig? (S. 361).
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
by A. Einstein (1909)
Im Beitrag: "Wurde Albert EINSTEIN das Opfer der Wissenschaftler seiner Zeit?" wurde besonders hingewiesen auf folgende Veröffentlichung von Albert Einstein aus dem Jahre 1909:
"Über die Entwicklung unserer Anschauungen über das Wesen und die Konstitution der Strahlung". Diese Veröffentlichung liegt inzwischen auch in englischer Sprache im Internet vor, siehe nachstehend:
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »