By Bruce Harvey
Relativity: Fact and Fiction
A causal theory of Special Relativity based on the work of Lorentz and Poincaré
Abstract
We examine the two theories of Lorentz-Poincaré relativity and Einstein’s special relativity. One a causal theory based on Maxwell’s Equations, the other pure mathematics derived from a philosophical assumption.
ERRORS OF MODERN PHYSICS THEORIES
(Last revised 24 November 2001)
Copyright by the author Prof. Dr. Rati Ram Sharma- all rights reserved.
This article brings out the unrealities, flaws, inadequacies and shortcomings of the major current theories of Physics and Cosmology to justify formulation of the newly proposed Unified Physical Theory (UPT) as the way out.
KeyWords: Relativity, stellar aberration, Sagnac effect, gravitation, ether.
amazon
Description
The book gives a simple explanation to, and history of, Einstein’s theory. Many errors in the interpretations of the basic phenomena are explained. An alternative theory is presented. The wave model explains light and the particle model explains gravity. The wave or particle confusion is solved.
This book demonstrates that many of the physical phenomena behind Einstein’s theory have alternative interpretations. New ideas regarding light and old ideas regarding ether indicate a way out of the wave or particle confusion and allow absolute space and absolute, universal time.
Siehe auch vom gleichen Autor in diesem Blog:
"Illusions and Reality in Relativity"
Wie bereits im Artikel Hundert Autoren fragen Einstein mitgeteilt, hat die Natural Philosophy Alliance (NPA) aus den USA anläßlich des 100-jährigen Jubiläums 2011 des berühmten Zwillingsparadoxons aus der Speziellen Relativitätstheorie Albert Einsteins, einen Offenen Brief an die wissenschaftliche Gemeinde gerichtet mit dem Ziel, eine einheitliche Lösung dieses Paradoxons unter den vielen widersprüchlichen Auffassungen, die vertreten und gelehrt werden, herauszufinden. Diese Aktion wurde zum heutigen Datum von 137 Unterzeichnern aus der ganzen Welt unterstützt: http://twinparadox.net/
Die Initiatoren dieses Projekts haben jetzt einen Bericht über die bisherigen Ergebnisse dieser internationalen Umfrage online gestellt, siehe den gelb hinterlegten Text im Offenen Brief an die Physik-Gemeinde:
Epilogue – Results, Summary, Conclusion
Über weitere Entwicklungen des Projekts werden wir auf dem Laufenden gehalten.
By Harry H. Mark
Source: 18th Natural Philosophy Alliance Conference, July 2011
Three pivotal empirical measurements determined the speed of light in relation to a moving observer or its source.
1. Ole Roemer (1644–1710) found that the speed of light from Jupiter’s satellite was lower when an observer on earth was moving away from it, and higher on approach.
2. James Bradley (1693–1762) determined that the speed of light from a star was higher when an observer on earth moved towards its perpendicular incident, and lower on recession.
3. Albert Michelson (1852–1931) examined the speed of light when both the source and the observer were on the same moving earth. Under these circumstances the speed surprisingly did not change.
The Neutrino: Doomed from Inception
B.S. in Mathematics, M.A. in Linguistics
18th Natural Philosophy Alliance Conference, July 2011
Neutrino existence has been embraced by numerous scientists with new theories despite grave problems. It appears to have desirable characteristics for many new theories. Yet, if scientists with new theories were to study the origin and evidence for neutrinos, they would discover neutrino existence as a folly.
Copyright Walter Babin
Update Sept. 10, 2002
The constancy of the speed of light in each frame of reference logically results in compound light speeds (c+v)(c-v) for all frames in uniform motion relative to an observer. This is the de facto explanation for the Sagnac effect. No other is required.
The logic is as follows:
If, according to the Michelson-Morley experiments and Galilean relativity, the speed of light is constant at [c] in each frame of reference,
By R.A. WALDRON
Head of School of Mathematics, Uuter Polytechnic, Co. Antrim, Northern Ireland.
THE BALLISTiC THEORY OF LIGHT AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR SPACE TRAVEL
Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. Vol. J2. pp. 95-98. 1978
An outline of the ballistic theory of light is given (for a full account see Waldron 1971). The theory is able to explain those phenomena of modern physics hitherto held to be explicable only by Einstein’s theory of relativity, such as the mass defect of atomic nuclei, positron-electron annihilation and pair production, Doppler effect, Compton effect, etc.
by Dr. M. Simhony, Israel
"EXPANDING UNIVERSE"- THE GREATEST MATHEMATICAL DECEPTION IN 20-TH CENTURY PHYSICS
1. Blueshifts, Redshifts, and the Doppler Effect. Based on the Faraday’s dielectric ether wave-theory of light, C.J.Doppler derived in 1842, that when the source (emitter) and/or the receiver (observer) of light move toward each other, then the frequency f’ of the received light is higher than the frequency f of light received when they are at rest. The frequencies of the received light, with all its spectral colors and lines, are thus shifted toward the higher frequency blue light. The received light is blue-shifted, by the difference between these frequencies, f ’ – f.
By A. A. Faraj
The Sagnac effect and related topics are discussed in detail and expounded within the framework of the Emission Theory of light.
The Sagnac Experiment:
Three plane mirrors, M1, M2, and M3, and a beam splitter P, are mounted on a turntable in a circular configuration of 25 cm radius. A coherent beam of light, from a source S, is made parallel by a lens L, and sent to P.The initial beam is split by P into two beams, A and B, which traverse the same polygon path in opposite directions.