Blog Ekkehard Friebe

By Prof. Dr. Rati Ram Sharma

ERRORS OF MODERN PHYSICS THEORIES
(Last revised 24 November 2001)
Copyright by the author Prof. Dr. Rati Ram Sharma- all rights reserved.

This article brings out the unrealities, flaws, inadequacies and shortcomings of the major current theories of Physics and Cosmology to justify formulation of the newly proposed Unified Physical Theory (UPT) as the way out.

1. An Overview
The Relativity [1-3] and Quantum Theories [4,5] dominate every field and aspect of Physics and other sciences but stand apart due to their lack of common conceptual foundations. The concept of "quarks & leptons as the most basic constituents of matter" was expected to bring order in the diversity of elements [6,7] but has itself led to over a hundred elementary particles, making the term "element" meaningless. Nay, the Super Symmetry doubles this number. The D-Zero [8] and CDF [9] collaborations have, in fact, established compositeness of quarks and leptons by "observing" them as transiently created or assembled from the energy of the proton-antiproton collisions but these collaborators still treat them as non-composite elements of the modern Standard Model [6, 7, 10-13]. A real physical object, for its existence and phenomena, does not actually need any observer but was wrongly taken to be governed by not the actual but observed magnitudes of its physical parameters which are associated with imprecisions given by the famous Heisenberg relations ? E . ? t h/2? and ? p . ? x h/2? of the Uncertainty Principle [14]. This thereby wrongly introduced and validated violations of the otherwise inviolable conservations of energy-mass and momentum, occurring within the limits set by these relations. The thence derived inverse energy-distance relation ? E.? x ch/2? led to a host of bizarre notions like that of a micro particle being composed and bound by more massive subunits than itself. Lorentz transformations and the thence deduced relativistic ‘contractions of length’ and ‘dilatations of time’ are not even the observer-dependent subjective appearances but were wrongly taken to describe the reality objectively.

The concepts of space and time evolving from the percepts of successive motions and changes in the surroundings, are in fact abstract but were wrongly taken to fuse into concrete spacetime continua and hyperspaces to found numerous mathematical theories [15-18] which therefore have little physical significance. The wave-or-quantum dualities of radiation and matter are not yet explained by Quantum Theory, nor does Relativity explain the founding postulates on the constancy and invariance to source-observer motion, of light velocity c. The Big Bang & Steady State theories [19, 20] of Expanding Universe wrongly invoke the unrealistic "initial creations of matter-out-of-nothing". Because [20] "in science it does not matter how strange an idea may seem so long as it works i.e. can be expressed in a precise (mathematical) form"! This strange justification proposes new (unscientific) definition, tenet or scope of "science"!

The above and other unrealities/inadequacies have made the modern Physics so unrealistic that even the most celebrated Physicists cannot explain the objective reality the way one would like to through popular science language and visualisable concepts related to the common human experiences. They feel contented, nay elated, with using abstruse mathematics which does not need or admit any visualization. But all these theories claim and strive to describe the same objective reality, which is beyond observation even with the most powerful instrumental aids. Hence all of them are speculative and contain infirmities due to limitations of the signal mediated human perception. Since original ideas can occur to any and many, the theories are numerous. But what should make a theory acceptable?

Lesen Sie bitte hier weiter!