Henning Lundsgart: „The Theory of Relativity – a mistake build on wrong precondition“
Nachstehend bringe ich einen Beitrag von Henning Lundsgart, Dänemark 2005.
Zitat:
The Theory of Relativity
— a mistake build on wrong precondition —
Introduction
It is a fundamental precondition of the theory of relativity, that it is impossible to measure velocity relative to the ether, but measuring of this has been demonstrated several times. So The Theory of Relativity is no description of the reality. The underlying experiment of the Theory of Relativity is Michelson and Morley’s attempt to measure velocity relative to the Ether. In their report Michelson and Morley (1887 p.341) concluded:
The relative velocity of the earth and the ether is probably less than one sixth the earth’s orbital velocity, and certainly less than one-fourth.
That is a relative velocity of 5 respectively 7.5 km per second between the Ether and the basement room where the measuring device was placed. When the expectation had been about 300 kilometres per second, a result like this was disappointing, and thus estimated as a null-result. In any case there were many people who had those opinion, for example Albert Einstein. However 5 – 7.5 km per second is the same as 18,000 – 27,000 kilometres an hour, which according to common earthly relations is considerable velocities.
If we nevertheless assume a totally negative result, it means, that the velocity of light is totally unaffected by the rotation of the Earth and its orbital velocity around the Sun as well as the Sun’s own velocity. In other words, the velocity of light is always the same in all directions. From just that point of view Einstein formulated a principle of relativity like this: >>The laws of nature have the same simple form in all systems, in relation to which the principle of inertia applies (inertial systems). Of this follows, that no inertial system is in absolute rest. All inertial systems are equal, and all movements are thus relative. <<
However this formulation was not without problems. In his book The Meaning of Relativity Einstein (1960 p.57) wrote:
The weakness of the principle of inertia lies in this, that it involves an argument in a circle: a mass moves without acceleration if it is sufficiently far from other bodies; we know that it is sufficiently far from other bodies only by the fact that it moves without acceleration.
So Einstein confess, that the principle of inertia in reality says: 1) a mass moves without acceleration, when it moves without acceleration. Or, if we eliminate the acceleration, 2) a mass is sufficiently far from other bodies, when it is sufficiently far from other bodies. – Still undisturbed Einstein says 3 lines lower down:
We may look upon the principle of inertia as established, to a high degree of approximation, for the space of our planetary system, provided that we neglect the perturbations (disturbances) due to the sun and planets.
Thus Einstein seems to be convinced that the principle of inertia contains a statement, which can be made an object for closer examination and argumentation. But neither 1) nor 2) contains anything else than a repetition of one in itself meaningless collocation of words.
In a celebration-speech Einstein (1920 p.15) said:
Summarizing we can say: According to the general theory of relativity the space has certain physical qualities; in this sense an Ether does exist. According to the general theory of relativity a space without ether is unthinkable; because in a space like this, not only the transmission of light would be impossible, there could not exist measuring sticks or clocks, thus neither distances in time nor space in the physical sense. This ether should not be thought endowed with properties characteristic of ponderable media, or consist of parts that can be traced through time; the concept of motion is not to be used on it.
Thus Einstein acknowledge the existence of an Ether, but says that the concept of movement is not to be used on it. Thus the whole Theory of Relativity stands or falls with whether it is possible or not possible to measure velocity relative to the Ether. If it is possible the theory is falls. – Einstein (1925) wrote to the physicist Robert Millikan (Clark 1971 p.328):
I believe that I have really found the relationship between gravitation and electricity, assuming that the Miller experiments are based on a fundamental error. Otherwise the whole relativity theory collapses like a house of cards.
(Zitatende)
Lesen Sie bitte hier weiter!
Beste Grüße Ekkehard Friebe
- 21. November 2009
- Englischsprachige Kritik der Relativitätstheorie
- Kommentare (0)