The Convergence of New Physics Paradigms: Unity in Diversity

by Greg Volk 
1153 Tiffany Circle N, Eagan, MN 55123

The sections in this paper were originally written for the website of the newly forming Global Science Foundation (GSF) [1], to introduce non-technical readers to the various categories of research among independent scientists today. Now they can also be found under the “Topics” heading of the World Science Database (WSD) [2]. Their second purpose is to expose researchers in each individual area to work arising from other areas, encouraging them to recognize common ground with research in completely different disciplines.

Indeed the convergence of key ideas across disciplinary boundaries is striking, strengthening the conviction that the paradigms emerging among independents today are both profound and unifying. However, just as for decades individuals have developed theories in isolation, so entire communities of independent scientists have emerged in complete ignorance of the larger community of paradigm challengers. Today the WSD and GSF are committed to breaking down these walls of isolation. Thus, in celebration of the fact that the “Electric Universe” community will join the Natural Philosophy Alliance (NPA-18) at its annual conference in July 2011, this paper collects the various short essays into a single unit. Hopefully, the reader can sense the full weight of paradigms poised to change the face of science drastically and forever. While the various categories could be categorized in a number of ways, topics here include: Cold Fusion, Cosmology, Electric Universe, Electrodynamics, Aether, Expansion Tectonics, Gravity, New Energy, Quantum Mechanics, Relativity, Structure, Tesla Technologies, and Unified Theory.

1. Introduction
Until the twentieth century, science was always cast under the broader definition of natural philosophy, or the study of nature and its laws. Since our knowledge of the universe has expanded so voluminously over the past 100+ years, the scientific community has compartmentalized much of what we know into more and more narrowly defined specialties. Today, however, the Global Science Foundation (GSF) recognizes the need for a return to a broader perspective, integrating and unifying the various branches of science, because emerging paradigms will arise precisely from better understanding of these unifying principles.

Thus, it’s no surprise to discover alternatives to current mainstream interpretations in virtually every discipline and subdiscipline of science, and to find common threads across disciplines.

But since knowledge literally advances one project at a time in one area of interest at a time, it’s obviously still helpful and useful to sort out the various GSF projects by topic. Therefore, this page attempts to introduce most of the various areas of GSF research, demonstrating how each area has something important to contribute to new paradigms in science.

Basic research attempts to answer the question, "How does the universe work?", as opposed to applied research, which seeks particular applications or technologies. And though life sciences are definitely foundational, GSF research focuses on physical sciences. Many categories, such as chemistry, materials science, or various branches of engineering, might be included in the list below, but are not considered "basic". Instead both chemistry and materials science, for example, would fall under the broader category of "Structure", since it is ultimately the structure of atoms and molecules that determine various properties of materials.

Listed below are a dozen or so categories in which current GSF projects naturally organize themselves, though projects are not required to fall into one of them. The categories reveal much about particular interests in independent science today, and therefore about the projects currently being considered and funded by the GSF.

Lesen Sie bitte hier weiter!

Kommentare

Einen eigenen Kommentar schreiben

Hinterlassen Sie eine Antwort

Erlaubter XHTML-Code: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>