Mathematical blunders in the special theory of relativity 2007
By Surendrajeet Singh 2007
Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: 2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen
zur Ergänzung der Dokumentation Textversion 1.2 – 2004, Kapitel 4.
Mathematical blunders in the special theory of relativity / Surendrajeet Singh. In: The General science journal. 2007 – 9 S. = http://wbabin.net/physics/singh.pdf
1. Abstract: Einstein formulated certain definitions in the special theory of relativity, but in its implementation, used different definitions for the same event.
This is against the rules of mathematics. No theory, even if it has a 100% match with experimental results can claim it is a proper explanation of science. It is unfortunate that non-scientific non-mathematical theories match experimental results. Any correct theory not only needs that the results meet experiment, but it is also essential that the definition and formulation must be scientific and mathematically correct. If it is not so, then the theory is not scientific. Even if it provides satisfaction for the human mind, a non-scientific theory is no help in the advancement of scientific theory.