Blog Ekkehard Friebe

Es folgt jetzt ein sehr wichtiger Beitrag von José Ledesma (Argentinien). 
Quelle: Relativistic paradoxes

Zitat:
THE COPERNICAN REVOLUTION WAS CHOKED
Einstein is wrong and with him… 
And with him not only the current paradigm, but also the dissidents who are fighting for the ether vindication.
The reason for this mistake shared by adherents and opponents is an underlying assumption that for millennia obscures the view of philosophers and scientists. To withdraw such hindrance is that the alleged ratifications experimental Einstein’s theory become clear in a restoration of Galilean relativity, Newton’s laws, formal logic and good sense.
It is very well known that the so-called paradoxes are originated from Einstein’s interpretation of phenomena occurring at lumininous speed. For many decades, these paradoxes, along with other phenomena anticipated by Einstein’s non-relativity, have been widely accepted, in the same way as we accept the tides, electric storm , and animal reproduction, to mention only a few examples.

It is also known that, in their labs, researcher claim to bear witness to the occurrence of such phenomen on a daily basis. The amazement to the neophyte produced by the interpretation of these phenomena is attributed to their brain’s inability to understand what is going on at speeds very much higher that their are conscious. In this paper, it will be shown that, at least in this case, there is no such inadequacy of human brains and that Einstein’s paradoxes are nothing but mere contradictions. These contradictions are the inevitable result of the forced hodgepodge of two confronting ideas in a same theory: the non-existence of the absolute space jumbled with the existence of it; it was a mistake in the logic use; this is the heart of Einstein’s non-relativity. How is it possible that such a hybrid has been conceived, accepted and held valid until present times? Because the right experiments, simples as they are, still were not made; as it will shown in the next pages, the reason for this absurdity has resided in the confusion produced by a prejudice. Thus, supreme principles of logic are discredited, namely:

If A is inmobile with respect to B, and C is also inmobile with respect to B, then A and C cannot be in relative motion. This eternal truth of logic and kinematic’s reality was made obsolete in order to support a bicentenary prejudice: though there is a worldwide consensus that the luminiferous aether was eradicated from physics by Einstein, the truth is that the aether is at ease, and, so far, has gone unnoticed in his own paradigm. The revelation of this fact in this article should be neuralgic to those few who are to understand it, not for lack of intellectual ability but of the rare independent thought.

(Zitatende)

Lesen Sie bitte hier weiter!

Beste Grüße Ekkehard Friebe