Blog Ekkehard Friebe

Darf man eigentlich irgendwo auf dieser Welt über die Albert Einstein zugeschriebene Spezielle Relativitätstheorie frei diskutieren? Hierzu eine Stellungnahme aus dem Jahre 1994 (Zitat):

„To the best of our knowledge, Einstein’s Theory of Relativity is intensely interesting to scientists, engineers and experts even in Chinese industrial community; quite a few of them, however, hold dissenting opinions. To deepen the understanding of this theory, a paper criticizing SRT has been published in our „Scientific discussion“ column of the Vol. 4, No. 2, 1993 issue. Our hope is to encourage a dialectic approach to truth. We invite free discussion.“ (Zitatende) 
In: Chinese journal of systems engineering and electronics. 5. 1994, Nr. 1, S. 77. 

Zitiert aus der Dokumentation der Forschungsgruppe G.O. Mueller
Über die absolute Größe der Speziellen Relativitätstheorie –
Kap. 3 – Das Relativitätsmärchen und die Fakten 

Inzwischen sind in China bereits zahlreiche kritische Arbeiten zur Speziellen Relativitätstheorie erschienen, siehe zum Beispiel den folgenden Beitrag von Prof. Zifeng Li:
“Special relativity arising from a misunderstanding of experimental results on the constant speed of light”
http://www.worldnpa.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_389.pdf

Beste Grüße Ekkehard Friebe

Darf man eigentlich in den USSR Kritik an Albert Einstein üben? Hierzu eine Stellungnahme aus dem Jahre 1990 (Zitat):

„This includes some high ranking scientists in the USSR, some of whom are now coming out in the open under glasnost – although, as in the West, prejudice still stands in the way where repression has gone. One Soviet scientist wrote us, <In our country we are now free to criticize Marx, Engels and Lenin, but not Einstein>.“ (Zitatende)

Petr Beckman: At the end of the first year: letter from the publisher.
In: Galilean electrodynamics. 1990, Nr. 6 (Nov.-Dez.), S. 70.

Zitiert aus der Dokumentation der Forschungsgruppe G.O. Mueller
Über die absolute Größe der Speziellen Relativitätstheorie –
Kap. 3 – Das Relativitätsmärchen und die Fakten

Inzwischen hat sich die Lage schon etwas verbessert. Siehe zum Beispiel den folgenden Beitrag von Sergey N. Arteha:
„The Michelson-Morley experiment“
http://www.antidogma.ru/english/node35.html

Beste Grüße Ekkehard Friebe

Nachstehend bringe ich eine Studie über die Natur der Zeit.
Quelle: The General Science Journal, http://wbabin.net/

Zitat:

NATURE OF TIME

(According to „Hypothesis on MATTER“)

Nainan K. Varghese, matterdoc@gmail.com

Abstract: Time is a functional entity, derived from the fundamental property of basic 3D matter particles (photons) to move at a constant linear seed. 3D matter has no ability to act or move. It is the all-encompassing universal medium around the 3D matter particle, which moves them at the highest possible speed. Unit of time is related to the interval required by a photon to traverse definite extent of universal medium in space. Relating other activities, about 3D matter bodies, to time help us to rationalise in terms of cause and effect relations. Due to its lack of physical form, time can neither expand nor contract nor flow in any direction.

Keywords: Time, disturbance, photon, 3D matter, quantum of matter, 2D energy field.

Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »

Nachstehend bringe ich einen Beitrag aus „The General Science Journal„ mit dem Titel:

An Analysis of Big Bang Theory as a Work of Fiction

By Sunil Thakur

Zitat:

I desperately tried to analyze big bang theory as a theory of physics that supposedly explains the process through which universe was created. The theory makes so many assumptions without explaining the scientific logic behind such assumptions that we have no choice but to treat it as a work of fiction. In fact, even a good work of fiction is supposed to have logical sequences and a good fiction writer takes great pains to logically explain the behavior of its characters. Even though big bang theory does not even qualify to be a good work of fiction yet it needs to be analyzed because many of us believe that it logically explains how the universe was created.

Let us examine the cosmological model as well as big bang theory.

Big bang theory suggests that universe is expanding with the space. The FLRW matric suggests that if we have all objects plotted on a grid then expansion has to be explained through the expansion of grids. The objects remain at same coordinates or same grids and the number of grids remain the same but the area covered by each gird increases and hence the distance between each grid increases too.

Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »

Wussten Sie eigentlich, dass bereits vor hundert Jahren, genau genommen im Jahre 1908, der Schweizer Wissenschaftler Walter Ritz beispielsweise folgende kritische Aussagen zur Allgemeinen Elektrodynamik von Maxwell (Maxwellsche Gleichungen) in französischer Sprache veröffentlicht hat?

 — „Die Theorie lässt unendlich viele Lösungen zu, die alle den gesetzten Bedingungen entsprechen, aber der Erfahrung widersprechen und z.B. zu einem perpetuum mobile führen.“
— „Actio und reactio sind nicht gleich, und diese Ungleichheit widerspricht der Erfahrung.“

Aber lesen Sie selbst im Einzelnen:

Walter Ritz: „Kritische Untersuchungen zur allgemeinen Elektrodynamik“
Übersetzt von „Recherches critiques sur l’Électrodynamique Générale“,
Annales de Chimie et de Physique, Vol. 13, p. 145, 1908. Verlag Dürr, CH-6574 VIRA (1991).
(Auszug aus der Einleitung, Seiten 8 bis 10)

Zitat (Übersetzung aus dem Französischen ins Deutsche):

Das Ergebnis meiner Betrachtungen ist den herrschenden Theorien nicht günstig. Die Erörterung von deren Schwierigkeiten führt auf eine gemeinsame Ursache, den allen Theorien gemeinsamen Ätherbegriff. Namentlich ergibt sich:

Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »

Es folgt eine weitere Fortsetzung von Kapitel 4 (Chapter 4) aus dem Buch von
Professor Wallace Kantor „Relativistic Propagation of Light“.  

Zitat:

BECKMANN-MANDICS CLOSED PATH EXPERIMENT

Light reflected from a rotating mirror was used in the related Beckmann-Mandics (1964) [13] experiment shown in Fig. 4. The experiment was done in air. Some of the apparatus (mirrors and mirror mounts) in this experiment can be recognized from photographs as that used in the Kantor [10] experiment. Except for differences in mechanical Implementation, the experiment is essentially the same in concept as the Kantor experiment with one notable exception. Instead of stroboscopic microsecond light flashes admitted at the moments when the rotating Windows W were normal to the light path, Beckmann caused light to be reflected from a rotating mirror RM mounted at the axis of rotation of the Windows.

It was stated that „if the rotor was off the perpendicular position by more than 0.5°, the chopping mirror RM diverted the incoming ray from its path into the interferometer and nothing could be seen in the telescope.“ An opportunity to witness the experiment was provided this author and the intense laser light was seen for nearly 360° rotation due to its reflection not only from the RM mirror surface but also, and with seemingly comparable intensity, by diffuse reflection, from the smooth and unpainted side and back surfaces of its aluminum mount.

Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »

Am 27. Juli 2009 erhielt ich vom Institut „Cosmos Publications“ mit E-Mail folgenden, sehr wichtigen Beitrag (PREAMBLE) mit dem Betreff: „The Empirical Invalidity of Einstein’s Special Relativity“ zugesandt. Dieser Beitrag ist deshalb besonders wichtig, weil der Autor sich die Mühe gemacht hat, die von der Princeton University Press herausgegebenen „Collected Papers of Albert Einstein“ auszuwerten. Er weist vor allem hin auf Einsteins Arbeit: „The Principle Ideas of the Theory of Relativity“ (1917).
Aber urteilen Sie bitte selbst: 

Zitat:

PREAMBLE:
HOW EINSTEIN DEMONSTRATED HIS MONUMENTAL CONFUSION ABOUT THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT

A. Einstein mis-described Maxwell’s law for the constant velocity of a light ray at c through a vacuum. Instead, Einstein described the changing velocity of a light ray with respect to a linearly moving body of reference.

Einstein’s 1905 Special Theory of Relativity is primarily about the velocity of a ray of light when it is emitted from a material body (such as a flashlight) and then travels (or ‘transmits‘) through the vacuum of empty space.

Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »

Ich bringe nun eine weitere Fortsetzung von Kapitel 4 (Chapter 4) aus dem Buch von
Professor Wallace Kantor „Relativistic Propagation of Light„:

Zitat:

DETECTABILITY OF FRINGE SHIFTS

The positive qualitative result of the Kantor experiment (1962) [10] contradicting the absolute speed of light hypothesis has yet to be duplicated. Three subsequently published attempts have yielded negative results, which were claimed as confirming the Einstein postulate on the absolute speed of light. These negative results were the consequence of a failure to properly adjust and maintain adjustment of the interferometer at its best condition for the detection of a fringe shift. The wrong conclusion, in all of these experiments, that the apparent null results sup-ported the absolute speed of light hypothesis, while seemingly reasonable, has been too hastily embraced.

The problem can best be appreciated by the consideration of the phenomenon of optical interference by a pair of coherent light sources as shown in Fig. 2.

(Zitatende)

Die Fig. 2 und den weiteren Text finden Sie hier!

Beste Grüße Ekkehard Friebe

Es folgt nachstehend die Fortsetzung von Kapitel 4 (Chapter 4) aus dem Buch von
Professor Wallace Kantor „Relativistic Propagation of Light„:

Zitat:

BECKMANN-MANDICS EXPERIMENT

The same assumption for the change of speed for the reflection of light at grazing incidence was made by Beckmann in the experiment by Beckmann and Mandics. [8] A contradiction with Fermat’s principle of least time is also explicitly made in that the angle of reflection r, shown in Fig. 1, is equal to the angle of grazing incidence i, even though the speeds of the incident and reflected light are assumed unequal. Beckmann and Mandics repeated the Tolman experiment in air and in vacuum fifty-four years later in 1964. Their moving light source, without the presence of a slit, was established by means of the reflection of light incident at 15° on a tiny mirror mounted on a rotor at 12.8 cm from the axis of rotation. For the reasons already given, their other null result experiments with a stationary-slit light source are inconclusive, and need not be discussed.

Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »

Ich bringe jetzt eine Textprobe von Kapitel 4 (Chapter 4) aus dem Buch von
Professor Wallace Kantor „Relativistic Propagation of Light„:

Zitat:

Chapter 4: INTERFEROMETRIC EXPERIMENTS ON THE SPEED OF LIGHT FROM MOVING SOURCES

The Lloyd mirror interferometric experiments, by Tolman in 1910 and by Beckmann and Mandics in 1964, on the speed of light from a moving source are shown to be unproductive of conclusive results. The related Rotz experiment in 1963 with moving slits is inconclusive since no experimental knowledge of the effect of slits on the speed of light is known.

The four closed-path interferometric experiments on the speed of light from moving reflecting and transmitting secondary sources are evaluated. The negative results obtained in three of them are shown to be due to a failure to correctly adjust and maintain adjustment of the interferometer at the optimum condition for the detection of a fringe shift. These three experiments are inconclusive rather than a confirmation of the Einstein absolute speed of light postulate. The qualitative „yes or no“ experimental results reported by the author in 1962 still remain as an undiscredited contradiction of Einstein’s second postulate on the absolute speed of light.

Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »