Mit Bezug auf den Beitrag:
Henning Lundsgart: “The Theory of Relativity – a mistake build on wrong precondition”
bringe ich nachstehend eine weitere Arbeit von Henning Lundsgart, Dänemark 2005.
Zitat:
Eclipse 1919
In Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 271-290, 1999. 892-3310 / 99 is found a very interesting article about the eclipse, which took place May 29, 1919, and which made Einstein world-famous overnight. It is written by Ian McCausland and the title is: “Anomalies in the History of Relativity”.
Here is briefly, what the article brings to light:
The First World War lasted from 1914 until the end of 1918 and the peace with Germany was signed June 28, 1919 (The Treaty of Versailles). But already in March 1917 the Astronomer Royal of Britain, Sir Watson Dyson, suggested that the total eclipse of the Sun that was to take place on May 29, 1919, would present an excellent opportunity to test the prediction of The General Theory of Relativity, that light would be bent by a gravitational field. Dyson undertook the organization of the eclipse expeditions, but did not go to observe the eclipse himself. It was Professor Arthur Stanley Eddington who became the leader of the eclipse expeditions.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
Ich nehme Bezug auf den Beitrag:
Henning Lundsgart: “The Theory of Relativity – a mistake build on wrong precondition”
und bringe im Folgenden eine weitere Arbeit von Henning Lundsgart, Dänemark 2005.
Zitat:
The Einstein Case
by H. Lundsgart
This is an account of some events within the natural science, which has had rather unfortunate consequences.
It all began with Michelson & Morley’s attempt to measure velocity relative to the Ether. The expected result was 300 km pr. second, but Michelson & Morley had only measured 5 – 7,5 km pr. second. These results were taken as proof of the impossibility of measuring velocity relative to the Ether, and this impossibility was turned into the very precondition for the Relativity Theory.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
Nachstehend bringe ich einen Beitrag von Henning Lundsgart, Dänemark 2005.
Zitat:
The Theory of Relativity
— a mistake build on wrong precondition —
Introduction
It is a fundamental precondition of the theory of relativity, that it is impossible to measure velocity relative to the ether, but measuring of this has been demonstrated several times. So The Theory of Relativity is no description of the reality. The underlying experiment of the Theory of Relativity is Michelson and Morley’s attempt to measure velocity relative to the Ether. In their report Michelson and Morley (1887 p.341) concluded:
The relative velocity of the earth and the ether is probably less than one sixth the earth’s orbital velocity, and certainly less than one-fourth.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
Nachstehend bringe ich einen Beitrag von Christos A. Tsolkas (Copyright 2009)
Zitat:
ETHER AND LIGHT
Abstract
As is known, according to the Electrogravitational Theory (EGT), the following apply:
1. Ether exists in nature, it fills up the entire universe and is the absolute reference frame.
2. Ether consists of positive electrins +q° and negative electrins –q°.
3. A positive electrin, +q°, is the quantum of positive electricity, while a negative electrin -q° is the quantum of negative electricity.
4. The electric charge of the positive or negative electrin equals (in terms of absolute value) the electric charge of the electron, that is: |+ q°| = |? q°| = q° = e = 1,6 ?10^(?19) Cb
5. The positive and negative electrins of Ether obey Coulomb’s law, that is, heteronymic electrins are attracted to one another and homonymic electrins are repelled by one another via electric forces.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
Nachstehend bringe ich ein kurzes Zitat von Nobelpreisträger Frederick Soddy:
„What one complains about in the Quantum Theory, and still more in the theory of Relativity, is that the objections are never frankly met. The weak points are disguised by a torrent of word-spinning.“
F. Soddy: The wider aspects of the discovery of atomic disintegration. In: Atomic digest. 2. 1954, Nr. 3, S. 15.
Siehe hierzu auch:
Nobelpreisträger Frederick Soddy: Die Relativitätstheorie ist ein anmaßender Schwindel und ein Schritt zurück in das Reich der Phantasie und des Mystizismus
UND:
Die Kritik des britischen Nobelpreisträgers Frederick Soddy wird unterdrückt
Beste Grüße Ekkehard Friebe
Nachstehend bringe ich einen weiteren Beitrag von Walter Babin:
Zitat:
Special Relativity and the Sagnac Effect
Copyright © Walter Babin, Update Sept. 10, 2002
The constancy of the speed of light in each frame of reference logically results in compound light speeds (c+v)(c-v) for all frames in uniform motion relative to an observer. This is the de facto explanation for the Sagnac effect. No other is required.
The logic is as follows: If, according to the Michelson-Morley experiments and Galilean relativity, the speed of light is constant at [c] in each frame of reference,
1. Light must travel a distance d = (c+v) in time t or (c-v)t in the opposite direction in the moving frame as measured in the reference frame of a „fixed“ observer, or,
2. Space (or a combination of space-time) must contract in the direction of motion, or contrary to relativistic doctrine, expand in the case where the light wave is opposite to the direction of motion, by the value, [vt]. (Regarding ring lasers, the distance (d) is fixed at 2?R and the time taken is t1 = d/(c-v) and t2 = d/(c+v) respectively. The difference, t1 – t2 = 2dv/c2 – v2)
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
Auf folgenden Beitrag von Walter Babin möchte ich besonders aufmerksam machen.
Zitat:
A Classical Replacement for Special Relativity
Copyright © Walter Babin
„Nothing astounds us more than common sense“ – Ralph Waldo Emerson.
Abstract:
The following analysis of the theory of special relativity proves conclusively that all formulas and physical effects devolve to those of classical mechanics and electrodynamics. Specifically, they identify relativistic effects as due to the Doppler modifications of wavelengths, frequencies and energies naturally occurring because of the finite velocity of light in the observer’s frame of reference.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
Ich nehme Bezug auf eine Arbeit in diesem Blog von Dr. Louis Essen, D.Sc., F.R.S. unter dem Titel Relativitätstheorie – Scherz oder Schwindel? oder RELATIVITY – joke or swindle?. Heute bringe ich eine andere Veröffentlichung von Dr. Essen, welche die katastrophale Situation im Bereich der Theoretischen Physik besonders anschaulich beleuchtet.
Zitat:
Relativity
Einstein’s theory of relativity was dealt with very briefly in my university course but we were told that we must not expect to understand it. I accepted this situation and I have since discovered that most physicists are content to remain in the same position assuming that it must be right because it is generally accepted. My doubts about it arose when I found that the experts did not understand either. An exchange of letters in Nature between Dingle and McCrea showed that they had opposite views about some of the predictions of the theory and the arguments advanced on both sides were in my view illogical and unconvincing. Much of the discussion about the theory was concerned with the readings of clocks when they are moving relatively to each other, and since I had a wide experience of comparing clocks and measuring time it seemed to be almost a duty to take a closer interest in the controversy especially as some of the so-called relativity effects although very small were not becoming significant in the definition of the atomic second and the use of atomic clocks.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
Ich nehme Bezug auf meinen Blog-Eintrag: Nikolai Rudakov: „Establishment”. Aus dem dort genannten Buch (1981): „Fiction stranger than truth – In the metaphysical labyrinth of relativity” von Nikolai Rudakov bringe ich nachstehend eine weitere Leseprobe:
Zitat:
11 Einstein’s Assumptions
Let us review and restate the essential elements of Einstein’s argument as they emerge after consideration of the simultaneity definition and the rod experiment, expounded in the first two chapters of the 1905 paper. These chapters, headed Definition of Simultaneity and On the Relativity of Lengths and Times, contain the core of the Einsteinian argument and incorporate a number of basic assumptions which we are now going to separate and briefly examine. Our examination will indicate that the tenets of relativity are contained in the assumptions, particularly in the assumptions of length change and time change. Einstein refers to them as the relativity of lengths and times.
1. Newtonian space. Despite relativistic Claims that Einstein has „overcome“, „invalidated“ or „rejected“ Newtonian absolute space, his argument cannot get off the ground and proceed through its various twists without it. What he calls the stationary System is an absolutely fundamental and essential concept in his reasoning, and at the beginning of his exposition he defines it as one in which the equations of Newtonian mechanics hold good.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
Ich nehme Bezug auf meinen Blog-Eintrag: Nikolai Rudakov: „Establishment”. Aus dem dort genannten Buch (1981): „Fiction stranger than truth – In the metaphysical labyrinth of relativity” von Nikolai Rudakov bringe ich nachstehend eine weitere Leseprobe:
Zitat:
10 Simultaneity
The first chapter of Einstein’s 1905 paper has the heading Definition of Simultaneity. The choice of this heading indicates the point of departure and the direction of the initial thrust of the Einsteinian argument. The concept of time has been chosen as target, and it is its fundamentality and universality which has to be demolished. After briefly introducing the notion of a Newtonian mechanical System, Einstein says: If we wish to describe the motion of a material point, we give the values of its co-ordinates as functions of time. Motion is a function of space as well as time, but the question of space is not analysed in Einstein’s discourse on special relativity, although it is obviously just äs important as the question of time. The argument continues: A mathematical description oft his kind has no physical meaning unless we are quite clear as t o what we understand by „time“. The word „time“ is now placed in quotations marks indicating that Einstein is not prepared to concede that the concept of time is entitled to exist in its own right and to be considered as a primary and basic component of physical reality together with space. This denial of the real existence of time prior and apart from matter is one of the most persistent ideas of Einsteinian relativity.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »