By Peter Kohut, Slovakia
Abstract
It is unnecessary to perform experiments to prove the invalidity of Special Relativity Theory (SRT) since the logical errors are sufficient. The following simple example shows how SRT violates the causality principle.
Analysis
Let two rockets are in mutual rest at considerable distance in a free cosmic space. Their clocks are synchronised and start at the same moment that they both accelerate at the same rate towards one another for one hour. After acceleration, they move uniformly.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
By J.G. Klyushin
Foreword to English Edition
This book presents a new approach to the Relativity Theory (RT) and Quantum Mechanics (QM). Besides the main motivation for the new approach – that RT and QM appear to be incompatible with one another – we note that a number of physically important cases and well documented experiments cannot be explained in the framework of the two theories. This approach has been presented at several conferences and symposia organized by International Scientists Club (ISC) in Russia and Natural Philosophy Alliance (NPA) in USA since 1990’s.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
By Prof. Franco Selleri
Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Bari INFN, Sezione di Bari
Google books
This book reviews the results obtained in recent years by the author in relativistic physics. The recently increased conviction about the conventional definition of relativistic simultaneity has opened the doors to new ideas, in spite of the fact that research has shown that simultaneity in the physical reality exists and is not at all conventional. If the coefficient of the space variable x in the Lorentz, or other, transformation of time (we call it e1) had a conventional nature it should be possible to modify it without touching the empirical predictions of the theory.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
By Ravil Kalmykov
1. About a technique of comparison of spatial segments
Unfortunately, all former fair critical remarks of considerable number of sane fair researchers to address of Lorentz transformations customary in special relativity have not been perceived by scientific community to the right degree. Reasons of the author of this article about a methodological incorrectness of the process of deducing of these transformations have not considered too [1]. Apparently these failures should be referred on special world outlook and methodological complexity of a situation and for the present bad persuasiveness of the critical argument. We shall try to be more convincing well.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
By LI ZIFENG*, LI TIANJIANG, WANG CHANGJIN, TIAN XINMIN and WANG ZHAOYUN
Petroleum Engineering Institute, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, 066004, China
This paper studies the current status of special relativity in science and philosophy as well as society, and reasons for special relativity to achieve its fame, and presents three academic viewpoints, four public attitudes, comments of known scientists on special relativity, and lists periodicals, scientific meetings, and networks studying questions on special relativity. We summarize various arguments about special relativity, analyze the logic mistakes contained in special relativity, and investigate the authenticities of validations and applications of special relativity.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
By Marvin E. Kirsh
The California State University Los Angeles Department of Anthropology
Abstract
The theory of relativity (1) is considered form a perspective of folklore. Abstracted entities in the theory of relativity are stripped of units in order to provide explanation, to expose an ordinary meaning that employs a fulcrum for visual description.
It is suggested that components of the theory’s construction are not only unusually compatible with religious and spiritual but are also unaccounted for scientifically; they may not render the expected power struggle of church doctrine with scientific notions but an opposite situation in which logical contradiction at the root level of physical meaning and symbolism is absent and might exist only with respect to active perceptual structuring, either functioning on the unknown or belief.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
By © Our Pal Asija 2009
Special Relativity Theory versus Science Reality and Truth (SRT v/s SRT)
From Aristotle to Einstein Even To Date Same Folly Rules the Paradigm of Special Relativity
This paper and concomitant presentation trace the errors in special relativity to Aristotle more than two millennia ago and how with an unintended boost from an Icon of Science Einstein himself, the paradigm that rules physics and indeed all science has been corrupted, which main stream science continues to follow blindly and even worship Einstein for it as a gesture of gratitude. How could the great scientist make such an error and why scientists still not have been able to fix it is an ever perplexing and baffling mystery, which I will try to demystify.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
By Thomas E. Phipps, Jr., U.S.A.
To Seek the Truth in the Face of Authority: The Work of R.A. Waldron (1990)
Editor’s note: Richard A. Waldron passed away in Northern Ireland on May 24 of this year, shortly before he was to retire from the University of Ulster. Just prior to his death, Professor Waldron had agreed to join the editorial board of APEIRON, and contributed an article on stellar collapse which he eagerly looked forward to seeing published in this journal (see page 4).
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
By Ian McCausland
Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G4
Keywords: Einstein—relativity—history of science
Abstract
Albert Einstein’s scientific career is studied, with the purpose of trying to explain why he became such a universally famous and revered person.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
