Blog Ekkehard Friebe

By Nikolai K. Noskov 2002

Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: 2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen
zur Ergänzung der Dokumentation Textversion 1.2 – 2004, Kapitel 4. 

To a problem on limitation of a field of application classic mechanics / Nikolai Noskov; translated from Russian by Jury Sarychev. – [Russland]: WWW 2002.  21 S. (N-T.ru / Current publications / Science today.)  The reduced and processed version [1] Nikolay NOSKOV 
Translated from Russian by Jury SARYCHEV Full version of the article in PDF (146 kb)

Introduction

In the beginning 20 centuries in physics happened events, which one strongly changed its contents. There were two reasons lying in the ground of these events.

The first reason was that all attempts to be out from empiricism of a classic mechanics and from its logic of construction have appeared unsuccessful. In spite of the fact that the researchers were not satisfied with impossibility of extract directly from this theory neither principles of a short-range interaction, nor mechanism of gravitation, nor properties of world medium, with which one all this connected.

Attempts to be pulled out from rigid frame of a classic mechanics within the framework of the definite rules have resulted in occurrence of its several versions constructed on the basis of different sets of initial principles. From that one three principles were constant: Euclidean space, Newtonian time and law of conservation of mass. It is a power mechanics of a Newton – Euler – Laplace. It, so-called field mechanics, based on a principle of least action of Mopertuy, Euler and Lagrange, on an energy conservation law of Lagrange, Hamilton, Jacoby and Ostrogradskiy. And, at last, it is a forceless mechanics of Hertz.

The second reason was, that the researchers, as it seemed them, could not explain facts and natural phenomena were detected in frameworks already constructed classic mechanics. It also has formed the basis for origin STR, G?R and quantum mechanics.

However STR and G?R based on such postulates, which one could not be compatible with existence of world medium and, furthermore, space, time and mass jointed in interdependent essences start to be distorted by speed of bodies.

Refusing ideals (world outlook concepts) of classic mechanics, namely: Euclidean space, unified universal time and law of conservation of mass, which one are fundamental world outlook categories of materialists, lead to the sharp protest of the researchers and philosophers, which one adhered and adhere of the materialistic concepts. For this reason there was an acute scrambling against STR and GTR, which one does not cease for one second since these theories arose. However apologists of the relativistic theory managed to capture dominating positions in scientific establishments, where they have taken advantage to the full.

Probably, only it can explain the fact that the experiment on optician of moving mediums conducted before and after appearance of STR, were used partially, only in that part, where they do not contradict STR. Or they were given only formal relativistic explanation, which one, as a rule, is not founded on causality and on common sense.

However it is possible to state following now:

Researches of rotatory effect conducted by Garris in 1912 [2], Sagnac in 1913 [3], Michelson and Gel in 1925 [4], Pogany in 1926 [5], simply prove, that the ether exist. In this occasion S. Vavilov, ex-president ?S?.USSR, has noted [6], «If the phenomenon of Sagnac was discovered earlier, than the zero outcomes of experiments of the second order were found out, it, certainly, would be considered as the brilliant experimental proof of an ether (is selected by me – N.N.)». It is only to be surprised: why «would be considered», instead of is considered?

Lesen Sie bitte hier weiter!