Blog Ekkehard Friebe

By Alexander Mitkovsky 2005

Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: 2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen
zur Ergänzung der Dokumentation Textversion 1.2 – 2004, Kapitel 4. 

The relativity of time and the postulates of special relativity: October 20, 2004 – February 5, 2005 [datiert im Internet: 27.2.05] / A. Mitkovsky. In: The general science journal. 2005 – 5 S.

http://wbabin.net/mitkovsky/mitkovsky.pdf

Auszüge: "From which it follows that the times are not synchronous. This conclusion was necessary as it forms the basis of the theory of relativity upon which all subsequent formulas depend. But this statement contradicts the evidence of the above experiments and definitions wherein time is synchro­nous.

The speed of light was not used in our derivations regarding the definition of synchronism of time. Which approach is right? What tool should be used to account for the derivation of synchronism? For example, we used for this purpose the concept of distance – a concept on which the definition of a coordinate system is based, whereas Einstein uses a derivative of distance, – time. (…)

As we see, the formulas in equations (5) have nothing in common with those of (4). In them, there is no hint of a divergence of time in points A and B with the movement of a rod in space. Then what is shown by the equations of (4)? In these, there is no synchronization of time between two moving points.

This cannot be accomplished without changing the rules determining the position in space of one of the points. Since we consider time based on the parameters of the motion of points in space any change will result in a change of the parameters of time. (…)

Thus, an analysis of the preconditions has shown an inconsistency in relativity theory. (…)

Obviously here, as in the other case, the expression makes sense only at v = 0, from which we can deduce that the formulas of the theory of relativity derived from the expressions, (V – v) and (V + v) are incorrect.

Since the theory of relativity is based on these expressions, all mathematical derivations are incorrect.

Any assumption that Einstein is correct lies in the area of philosophy and not in mathematics. If experiment shows that the formulas are correct, it can only mean that the answer was derived using incorrect preconditions, which on an operational basis will result in a divergence between the theory and practice and engender insoluble contradictions."

Lesen Sie bitte hier weiter!