Blog Ekkehard Friebe

 By Roberto A. Monti and Geradina A. Cesarano Monti

Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: 2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen
zur Ergänzung der Dokumentation Textversion 1.2 – 2004, Kapitel 4. 

The real Einstein
Roberto A. Monti and Geradina A. Cesarano Monti. – [Italien]: WWW 2006 ca., 66 S.
URL: http://www.lowenergytransmutations.org/documents/the-real-Einstein_EN.pdf  

 The real Einstein

Abstract. 
There is a definite coherence and continuity of the non – null results of the interferometric experiments, which cause the Theory of Relativity unlikely to be sound.

Optical Gyroscopes disprove everyday Special Relativity. The entire Theory of Relativity, both Special and General and its cosmological implications, the Big Bang and the Expanding Universe are highly speculative. Relativity has proved to be the greatest scientific swindle in the history of Modern Science.
[————-]
Key words. 
Theory of Relativity, Electromagnetic (one way) measurements of the Speed of Light, Kinematic measurements of the Speed of Light, Interferometric experiments, Electric conductivity of the Ether, Optical Gyroscopes, Cosmology, Background Radiation, Extragalactic redshifts.

Introduction. 
According to L. Essen, Einstein’s paper of 1905 is characterized by strange features as the brevity of the introduction…and the omission of any reference to the work of H. A. Lorentz and H. Poincaré (1).
In our opinion Essen is simply omitting to consider the elementary experimental evidence: that A. Einstein was a mediocre student, with the only possibility, once graduated, of becoming an employee of the Patent Office in Bern. Einstein came to know Michelson’s experiment in his student years, having read Lorentz’s book of 1895 (2): Soon I came to the conclusion that our idea about the motion of the Earth with respect to the Ether is incorrect, if we admit the Michelson null result as a fact (3).

As a German student he had, clearly, no occasion to read the original paper (in English) of Michelson and Morley: otherwise he should have known that the experimental result was beneath expectations, but not null. The relative velocity of the Earth and the Ether is probably less than one sixth of the Earth orbital velocity (5 km/s) and certainly less than one fourth (7.5km/s)…the experiment shall be repeated (4).
Einstein came too soon to a wrong idea as a consequence of wrong information.

Moreover, as an employee of the Patent office in Bern, he had no opportunity to have direct knowledge of Experimental Physics, especially Electromagnetic Metrology: he was simply not acquainted with such things as references and bibliography. For this reason, in his Special Relativity paper, he did not mention Michelson’s name (1): he was simply admitting the Michelson null result as a fact (3). For the same reason, he did not know Michelson’s paper of 1904: Relative motion of Earth and Ether (5), which explains the principle of the Michelson-Sagnac Effect: the principle of the Optical Gyroscope (6), (7).

Lesen Sie bitte hier weiter!