Blog Ekkehard Friebe

By José Miguel Ledesma

Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: 2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen
zur Ergänzung der Dokumentation Textversion 1.2 – 2004, Kapitel 4. 

Relativistic paradoxes [Homepage]: the paradoxes – Michelson-Morley exp. – Einstein’s aether – the miscarriage of the relativity – unbelievable segment – Einstein is wrong / José Miguel Ledesma. – [Argentinien]: WWW 2011.
URL: http://www.trestipos.com.ar/ledesma/index.php?pagina=eegment&idioma=EN 
Einstein is wrong  –  Unbelievable segment

The following exposition shows how the suppression of logic has destroyed the most elemental kinematic. That is the reason why, today, several pseudo sciences and magic proliferate with total impunity. If doctor of physics -intelligent as they are- accept and support the constancy of the speed of light, then the rest of the population is ready to accept any ridiculous inconsistency. This is what would happen if the constancy of speed light was true:
Let’s picture ourselves above a segment with two point of reference at each extreme, A and B, and we receive light (blue arrow from the left) from a remote source in relation to which we are stationary.

Under this conditions, the time the light takes to travel the distance D between A and B points is T=D/c. This distance is the same for the source and the segment coordinate systems. But if the segment moves at a constant speed and direction, the time the light takes to cover the distance between A and B in the platform system shall depend on the distance the light has to travel in the system of the source, which, in turn, depends on the direction and the speed of the segment with respect to the source. This truth automatically rejects Einstein’s relativity second postulate in the part that reads that light velocity is independent from the observer’s state of motion. Light, just like any other object in motion, cannot escape from the essential fact that if an object moves towards it, then the travelling distance will be shorter in order to reach that object and vice versa. You can see that the opposite fact to the constancy of light speed concept is the existence of motion.
Consequently, for the observers on the segment, the distance travelled by light from A to B shall be, of course, the same. For the observers, the difference lies in the travelling time or the speed of light, which I will be able to measure with the device that has not been built yet (but which I would construct if I had the support).
But for those who believe in the constancy of the speed of light, regardless of the segment’s direction and speed in relation to the source, the travelling time of light from A to B in the platform system is always the same: T=D/c, no matter whether the light travels a micron or a million light years within the source’s system.

Lesen Sie bitte hier weiter!