Blog Ekkehard Friebe

By Chongwu Guo

Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: 2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen
zur Ergänzung der Dokumentation Textversion 1.2 – 2004, Kapitel 4. 

Reconsideration of relativistic time [datiert: 20.3.04]
In: The general science journal. 2004 – 7 S. = http://wbabin.net/physics/guo.pdf

Auszug: "Abstract: For a dynamic process occurring in an isolated system, this thesis proved that the dynamic results led to by the relativistic time under Lorentz transformation are incompatible with the law of conservation of momentum. The researches show the concept of the relativistic time is confronted with an insurmountable difficulty. The meaning of the relativistic time is explored against the Galilean transformation.

The conclusion is that the relativistic time can’t be regarded as clock time. (…)

1 Introduction – It is well know that special relativity theory has changed the space-time concepts formed since Newton’s time, and has achieved great triumphs.

The special relativity is based on the principle of relativity and the constancy of the velocity of light [1], and its basic postulates and some deductions have been verified by experiments [2]. Nevertheless, is the special relativity logically sound? The argumentations in this thesis show that the dynamic results arising from the relativistic time can’t meet requirement of the law of conservation of momentum.

2 Inconsistency with the Conservation of Momentum – Set up two inertial reference frames S and S‘.

The x-axis is coincident with the x‘-axis, y-axis is parallel to y‘-axis and z-axis parallel to z‘-axis. The frame S‘ is moving at a velocity v relative to the frame S in the x direction. When the origin of frame S‘ passes the origin of frame S, the clocks at the two origins read zero. Suppose the space-time coordinates for an event in frame S are related to the corresponding coordinates for the same event in frame S‘ by Lorentz transformation. (…)

Concluding remarks
It is nearly one century since A. Einstein established the special relativity. The relativity theory has made great influences on physics and philosophy. Nevertheless, the researches show the special relativity doesn’t hold water. As argued in the foregoing, the dynamic results due to the relativistic time are inconsistent with the law of conservation of momentum. We wonder whether the problems are flaws or anything else so far as the special relativity is concerned. Although the relativity theory has achieved great triumphs and its concepts of space-time have been accepted universally, we can’t thus affirm it is a perfect theory. If an incorrect theory has ruled our thought for a along time, what will have taken place to development of science?"

Lesen Sie bitte hier weiter!