How to realize quantum superluminal communication? 1999

 By Gao Shan

Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: 2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen
zur Ergänzung der Dokumentation Textversion 1.2 – 2004, Kapitel 4. 

How to realize quantum superluminal communication? (June 14, 1999) / Gao Shan. – [China]: WWW 1999. 4 S. / arXiv:quant-ph/9906116v2 8 Jul 1999
URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/9906116.pdf   –  Cornell University Library
We deeply analyze the possibility to achieve quantum superluminal communication beyond the domain of special relativity and present quantum theory, and show that when using the conscious object as one part of the measuring device, quantum superluminal communication may be a natural thing.

I. INTRODUCTION
After having shown quantum superluminal communication must exist in our world [5], we will further study the possibility to realize such superluminal communication, this is undoubtedly a formidable task within the scope of our present knowledge about Nature, since the two foundation stones of modern physics—special relativity and quantum mechanics all reject superluminal communication, thus in order to achieve quantum superluminal communication, we must first revise them.

II. REVISING SPECIAL RELATIVITY 
In order to admit quantum superluminal communication, special relativity needs to be changed only a little, and this does not limit its applicability in its previous territory at all, in fact, we only need to limit the scope of ”natural phenomena” in the principle of relativity, which is the first assumption of special relativity, namely the natural phenomena satisfying the principle of relativity will no longer involve all natural phenomena, and the quantum nonlocal influence is just such an exception [4], we call the new principle quantum relativity principle.

In fact, there exists nothing compelling in both theoretical considerations and experimental confirmations to require the validity of the principle of relativity for all natural phenomena, just as Einstein, the founder of special relativity, demonstrated himself [3], ”in view of the more recent development of electrodynamics and optics, it became more and more evident that classical mechanics affords an insufficient foundation for the physical description of all natural phenomena. At this juncture the question of the validity of the principle of relativity became ripe for discussion, and it did not appear impossible that the answer to this question might be in the negative.” Indeed, his worries become true when considering the quantum nonlocal influence in quantum theory.

On the other hand, although we have demonstrated that the quantum nonlocal influence rejects the relativity principle owing to the resulting causal loop [4], the deeper reasons need to be given, as Einstein denoted [3], the relativity principle originates from classical mechanics, the precondition of its validity will be ”all natural phenomena were capable of representation with the help of classical mechanics”, while quantum phenomena are evidently not such natural phenomena, and classical mechanics can no longer affords an sufficient foundation for the physical description of such phenomena either, concretely speaking, the relativity principle will hold true for the continuous motion of the real objects including particles and fields, while for the quantum nonlocal influence in quantum spacelike measurement, no real objects are transmitted in the process, and the process is also essentially discontinuous, thus there does not exist any real objects in continuous motion for the principle to apply in such process, and the earth beneath the feet indeed disappears, then it is by no means a surprising fact that the quantum nonlocal influence does reject the relativity principle [4].

Indeed, if one principle is valid for all natural phenomena, it will be too absolute to be true, the original relativity principle is just such a principle; on the other hand, its founder Einstein also ignored one subtle possibility, namely the invalidity of the relativity principle for some natural phenomena, say the quantum nonlocal influence, will not influence its validity for other natural phenomena, say classical phenomena.

At last, even though special relativity is revised so as to permit the existence of quantum superluminal communication, it provides nothing helpful for realizing such superluminal communication, since the origin lies in the quantum nonlocal influence itself, thus we must turn to the quantum theory.

Lesen Sie bitte hier weiter!

Kommentare

  1. Gerhard Klose 11. Mai 2013 (12:41 Uhr)

    GAO SHAN hat schon früh erkannt, dass Elektronen und Positronen Feldeigenschaften haben (1), die mit sehr großer Wahrscheinlichkeit demnächst im Nano-Bereich für die Computer-und Hochfrequenz-Kommunikation eingesetzt werden können. In diesem Sektor der überlichtschnellen Feldausbreitung gibt es bereits Anwendungen, zB. Tunneldiode, Tunnelelektron-Rastermikroskop und Feldemission.
    Die großen Halbleiter- und Computer-Konzerne forschen und entwickeln bereits in diesem Bereich.

    Gerhard Klose

    (1) http://www.kritik-relativitaetstheorie.de/2011/12/wie-kommt-die-lichtgeschwindigkeit-c-zustande

Einen eigenen Kommentar schreiben

Hinterlassen Sie eine Antwort

Erlaubter XHTML-Code: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>