Correct derivation of Lorentz transforms eliminates contradictions of Einstein’s relativity
By Harry H. Ricker III, 2005
Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: 2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen
zur Ergänzung der Dokumentation Textversion 1.2 – 2004, Kapitel 4.
Correct derivation of Lorentz transforms eliminates contradictions of Einstein’s relativity [datiert: 14.3. 05] / Harry H. Ricker III. In: The general science journal. 2005 – 14 S. =
http://wbabin.net/physics/ricker1.htm
"1.0 Introduction – This paper presents a refutation of Einstein’s special theory of relativity by a new mathematical method and uses this result to derive a new theory which eliminates the inconsistency of Einstein relativity.
The method relies on a procedure called evaluation which is essentially the same as used in the evaluation of an equation given a specified condition of evaluation. A crude and poorly defined nonrigorous method of evaluation was used by Einstein in his fundamental papers to determine the "physical meaning" of the Lorentz transforms "in respect to moving rigid bodies and moving clocks". In this paper, the method of evaluation is rigorously applied to the same problem.
The results obtained from the new approach to the evaluation of the Lorentz transforms are used to prove that the traditional solutions are inconsistent and contradictory.
Using the new method, it is demonstrated that the problem in Einstein relativity can be eliminated by a different mathematical interpretation, in which different inverse Lorentz transformations are derived that do not exhibit the paradoxes inconsistencies and contradictions of Einstein relativity. In the new theory, Einstein’s light velocity postulate is shown to be incorrect, and it is replaced with a different postulate that makes light velocity a constant but with different scales of measure. The new system is consistent with the postulate that the laws of physics, mechanics and electrodynamics, take the same form when transformed by the new Lorentz transformation equations. This is demonstrated by the fact that in the new theory, the Galilean transformation law remains valid, while in Einstein relativity it is invalid, a result which contradicts the postulate that the laws of mechanics keep the same form.
2.0 Background – In 1962 the late Herbert Dingle published his first refutation of Einstein’s special theory of relativity. Many years later, he published a book titled "Science At The Crossroads" which presents clearly why the special theory is untenable. The significance of Dingle’s results have been obscured by polemics launched by opponents who have obscured the issues and asserted without a really good proof that Dingle’s refutation is incorrect. However, these claims have never addressed the fundamental inconsistencies at the heart of the theory. Dingle’s refutation stands, although few scientists are aware of its existence.
This paper is the result of a analysis undertaken to study and understand the debate. It depends upon a new approach to demonstrating the inconsistencies and contradictions in the special theory of relativity. At the end, the reader will understand why it is successful.
Dingle had already shown the theory was untenable in 1962. Therefore, as the years go by, it is not surprising that new refutations are produced. These will progressively become better, stronger, and more convincing as the faults inherent to the theory become better understood."
Lesen Sie bitte hier weiter!