The Thought Experiment (November 2012)

 

Von G. O. Mueller, Forschungsprojekt

The Thought Experiment (November 2012)

Seit 2009 haben wir hier als Ergänzung zum G. O. Mueller Forschungsprojekt:
„Über die absolute Größe der Speziellen Relativitätstheorie“  das Kapitel 9 in deutscher Sprache: „Das Gedankenexperiment“ gebracht. Jetzt hat das Forschungsprojekt eine englischsprachige Übersetzung dieses Kapitels vorgelegt:  
On the Absolute Magnitude of the Special Theory of Relativity – Chapter 9 – The Thought Experiment  

Zitat: 
Preface
The undertaking of this translation we owe to the initiative and the generosity of Mr. Ekkehard Friebe, representative of our project to the public together with Ms. Jocelyne Lopez. Mr. Friebe provided the financial means and organized the cooperation with Mr. Bronrowan. After our first publications in English in 2006 with a short introduction into our project and the “First Open Letter” to some 290 personalities in 11 countries we intend now to provide a deeper insight into the motives of the project, the understanding of the peculiar circumstances in Germany and our decisions made during the realization. Chapter 9 tries to give an interim balance of our activities.  

With the publication of this English version we hope to extend the reach of our project and especially the understanding of what we call our Thought Experiment: an experiment about the effects of critical thoughts on the society.

We decided to present this chapter to the international public without any editing of the German text which was written for a German public and published in May 2009. Although it referenced some German actualities in autumn 2008 (pp. 14 – 23) which an international public of 2012 will not be familiar with, this will not hinder the full understanding of our reasoning and our activities.
Ninety years of suppression (1922 – 2012) of all criticism of the theory of special relativity – in the published media as well as in the education system from high school to university – are a catastrophe for the critics as individuals and for the society as a whole.

The society still has to learn about its mental state in the catastrophe of relativity.

We critics have to show a way out. One attempt is our Thought Experiment.

G. O. Mueller 

[—————-] 

1. The Need of New Approaches

The Break with Tradition of 1922
First Exposed in the Year 2001

The 1922 break with tradition in “theoretical physics”, brought about – firstly – by a seizure of power by the relativists within academic “theoretical physics” as a means of expelling the critical minority from scientific circles and – secondly – by the subsequent breach of faith vis-à-vis the public in concealing this seizure of power, was first exposed in terms of concrete occurrences by the present documentation, text version 1.1, in the year 2001; cf. Chapter 3: The Relativity Fairy Tale, pp. 288 – 294.

In the newer text version 1.2 from 2004, the topic was handled in Chapter 1, Introduction (pp. 14 – 21) and in Chapter 3, The Relativity Fairy Tale (pp. 270 – 275).

Up until the year 2001 this break with tradition undertaken by the academic “scientific community” had remained fully unknown to the public at large. The organizers of the academic physics community had understandably kept this secret, the other scientists and science historians had said nothing and the professional and general press organizations had been brought into line and had, by strict censorship, prevented the truth from seeping through to the public.

Since 1922 the physicists, the other scientists and the media moguls have created a large, secretive action group against the public in Germany, a cartel of censorship and boycott to prevent the very existence of any form of criticism of the special theory of relativity from becoming known.

One can well describe the events of 1922 as a conspiracy, as the agreement of a group of persons led by Planck, v. Laue, Born and Einstein to engage in clandestine, joint activities to the detriment of the public at large, in which scientific freedom in the field of theoretical physics would be done away with and the public would be deluded into believing in the primitive knockabout comedy of a candid, objectively critical natural science. These academic scientists henceforth behave as liars and cheaters. The conspiracy was a complete success. For the critics the catastrophic result can already be seen in 1922 in Leipzig – with the exclusion of criticism from the centenary celebrations – as well as in the subsequent years.

Again and again, critics have denounced in their writings the conspiracy of the relativistic physicists and their overwhelming success, as the “Terror der Einsteinianer” [Terror of the Einsteiners] (in the foreword to “Hundert Autoren gegen Einstein” [A Hundred Authors Against Einstein], 1931). We are speaking of the “terror of the relativistic physicists” and their accomplices. With their terror since 1922 they have not only organized a physical, but also a social relativity catastrophe.

Society has not wanted to hear the indictment of the critics since 1922, has not taken them seriously and has not reacted. The causes, the development and the consequences of this social catastrophe up to the present day must in future be fully researched so as to record the civic and characteristic failure of the so-called geniuses, luminaries and great thinkers, and their cowardice and involvement as accomplices and thereby the responsibility of the determinative social circles in the fields of science, journalism and education, for over 85 years.

The field of academic science is yet to be confronted with what will certainly be its greatest disgrace in the history of mankind. And society will discover that it has been successfully fooled, because it did not want to control a megalomaniac science. 

Zitatende.

Lesen Sie bitte hier weiter!

Kommentare

Einen eigenen Kommentar schreiben

Hinterlassen Sie eine Antwort

Erlaubter XHTML-Code: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>