{"id":3412,"date":"2013-07-26T02:36:41","date_gmt":"2013-07-26T01:36:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/?p=3412"},"modified":"2013-07-26T02:36:41","modified_gmt":"2013-07-26T01:36:41","slug":"inherent-contradictions-in-the-fundamental-proposals-of-special-theory-of-relativity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/inherent-contradictions-in-the-fundamental-proposals-of-special-theory-of-relativity\/","title":{"rendered":"Inherent contradictions in the fundamental proposals of special theory of relativity"},"content":{"rendered":"<dl class=\"clearfix fotol\" style=\"text-align: justify; width: 135px;\">\n<dt><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image- 1831\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/www.ekkehard-friebe.de\/bilder\/Bild-Richard-Ditsche%20und%20Ravil%20Kalmykov.jpg\" width=\"125\" height=\"175\" \/><\/dt>\n<\/dl>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b><\/b><b>By Sunil Thakur<\/b> 2009<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ekkehard-friebe.de\/Kap4_Erg_2012.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">2394 weitere kritische Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen <\/span><\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>zur Erg\u00e4nzung der <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kritik-relativitaetstheorie.de\/projekt-go-mueller\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">Dokumentation<\/span><\/a><\/strong> Textversion 1.2 \u2013 2004, Kapitel 4.\u00a0<br \/>\n<\/em><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><b>Inherent contradictions in the fundamental proposals of special theory of relativity <\/b>\/ Sunil Thakur. In: The General science journal. 2009 &#8211; 7 S. =<br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/wbabin.net\/physics\/thakur13.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">http:\/\/wbabin.net\/physics\/thakur13.pdf<\/span><\/a><\/strong><\/span>\u00a0<br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"><b>Abstract: <\/b>Einstein proves x=ct=x\u2019=xt\u2019, which is possible only if time runs faster when length contracts; Einstein then goes on to prove that time runs slower when length contracts. We must select one of the two contradictory proposals of the special theory of relativity. Which of these two contradictory proposals is right?<br \/>\n<\/span><b><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><!--more-->Introduction:<br \/>\n<\/span><\/b><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Einstein painstakingly establishes the compatibility of\u00a0 law of propagation of light with principle of relativity. A mere reading of the first line of the abstract is enough for any physicist to realize the contradictions in the two fundamental proposals of physics; but for us, it is more important to know, which of these two contradictory proposals is correct? <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">In this paper, which can turn the physics upside down, we will try to resolve this inherent contradiction but more importantly, we will try to establish the validity of Lorentz symmetry. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">First, let us analyze the contradictory proposals of theory of relativity. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Lesen Sie bitte <\/span><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><b><a href=\"http:\/\/wbabin.net\/physics\/thakur13.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">hier<\/span><\/a><\/b><\/span><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><b> <\/b>weiter!\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Sunil Thakur 2009 Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: 2394 weitere kritische Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen zur Erg\u00e4nzung der Dokumentation Textversion 1.2 \u2013 2004, Kapitel 4.\u00a0 Inherent contradictions in the fundamental proposals of special theory of relativity \/ Sunil Thakur. In: The General science journal. 2009 &#8211; 7 S. = http:\/\/wbabin.net\/physics\/thakur13.pdf\u00a0 Abstract: Einstein proves x=ct=x\u2019=xt\u2019, which is possible only [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3412","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-englischsprachige-kritik-der-relativitatstheorie"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3412"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3412"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3412\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3412"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3412"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3412"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}