{"id":3394,"date":"2013-06-28T04:45:04","date_gmt":"2013-06-28T03:45:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/?p=3394"},"modified":"2013-06-28T04:45:04","modified_gmt":"2013-06-28T03:45:04","slug":"flaws-in-the-logic-of-einsteins-special-theory-of-relativity-2000","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/flaws-in-the-logic-of-einsteins-special-theory-of-relativity-2000\/","title":{"rendered":"Flaws in the logic of Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity 2000"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\"\"<\/dt>\n<\/dl>\n

By Ilya Stavinsky <\/b><\/p>\n

Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: 2394 weitere kritische Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen <\/span><\/a>
\n<\/strong>zur Erg\u00e4nzung der Dokumentation<\/span><\/a><\/strong> Textversion 1.2 \u2013 2004, Kapitel 4.\u00a0 <\/em><\/p>\n

Flaws in the logic of Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity <\/b>\/ Ilya Stavinsky. – [Russland]: WWW 2000. In: Philosophical researches. Moscow. 2000, #4, 12\/2000. 4 S.\u00a0
\n<\/span>URL: <\/span>http:\/\/mars.superlink.net\/~dialect\/theory.html<\/span><\/a><\/strong><\/span>\u00a0
\nSpecial theory according to A. Einstein came into existence as the result of the fact that the propagation of light, which is independent from the speed of its source, could not be explained from the principle of relativity in classical mechanics. <\/span><\/p>\n

From here follows that if one can logically disprove this fact then special theory of relativity will lose its credibility and scientific meaning. In the following article the reader will find not only such an explanation but specific flaws in Einstein’s examples as well. <\/span><\/p>\n

The apparent incompatibility of the law of propagation of light with the principle of relativity. <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

The essence of this theory lies in the fact that it resolved contradiction in physics between the propagation of light which is independent from the speed of its source, and principle of relativity in classical mechanics. The latter states: if, relative to K, K“ is a uniformly moving co-ordinate system devoid of rotation, then natural phenomena run their course with respect to K“ according to exactly the same general laws as with respect to K. <\/span><\/p>\n

The above mentioned contradiction Einstein describes in the following way. ‚Now let us suppose that our railway carriage is again travelling along the railway lines with the velocity v, and that its direction is the same as that of the ray of light, but its velocity of course much less. Let us inquire about the velocity of propagation of the ray of light relative to the carriage. It is obvious that we can apply here the consideration of the previous section, since the ray of light plays the part of the man walking along relative to the carriage. The velocity W of the man relative to the embankment is replaced here by the velocity of light relative to the embankment; w is the required velocity of light with respect to the carriage, and we have w = c – v <\/span><\/p>\n

Lesen Sie bitte <\/span>hier<\/span><\/a><\/b><\/span>\u00a0 weiter!\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Ilya Stavinsky Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: 2394 weitere kritische Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen zur Erg\u00e4nzung der Dokumentation Textversion 1.2 \u2013 2004, Kapitel 4.\u00a0 Flaws in the logic of Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity \/ Ilya Stavinsky. – [Russland]: WWW 2000. In: Philosophical researches. Moscow. 2000, #4, 12\/2000. 4 S.\u00a0 URL: http:\/\/mars.superlink.net\/~dialect\/theory.html\u00a0 Special theory according to A. Einstein […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3394","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-englischsprachige-kritik-der-relativitatstheorie"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3394"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3394"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3394\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3394"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3394"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3394"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}