{"id":3389,"date":"2013-06-22T04:14:38","date_gmt":"2013-06-22T03:14:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/?p=3389"},"modified":"2013-06-22T04:14:38","modified_gmt":"2013-06-22T03:14:38","slug":"the-ritz-ballistic-theory-adjusting-the-speed-of-light-to-c-near-the-earth-and-other-celestial-bodies-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/the-ritz-ballistic-theory-adjusting-the-speed-of-light-to-c-near-the-earth-and-other-celestial-bodies-2\/","title":{"rendered":"The Ritz ballistic theory & adjusting the speed of light to c near the earth and other celestial bodies"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\"\"<\/dt>\n<\/dl>\n

By Nina Sotina<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/b> 2011<\/i><\/p>\n

Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: 2394 weitere kritische Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen <\/span><\/a>
\n<\/strong>zur Erg\u00e4nzung der Dokumentation<\/span><\/a><\/strong> Textversion 1.2 \u2013 2004, Kapitel 4.\u00a0 <\/em><\/p>\n

The Ritz ballistic theory & adjusting the speed of light to c near the earth and other celestial bodies:<\/b> NPA, Proceedings 2011, College Park, MD \/ Nina Sotina, Nadia Lvov. – [USA<\/span>]: WWW 2011. 5 S.
\n<\/span>URL: <\/span>http:\/\/www.worldsci.org\/pdf\/abstracts\/abstracts_6022.pdf<\/span><\/a>\u00a0
\n<\/strong><\/span>S. 1: „In 1908 Walter von Ritz suggested that the speed of light is equal to the constant c only when measured relative to the source. Ritz systematically redeveloped Maxwellian electrodynamics bringing it into agreement with this hypothesis. <\/span><\/p>\n

Assuming that c is the speed of light at the output of the light source and that the law of velocity addition from classical mechanics is valid for the case of a moving source, the results of the famous Michelson-Morley experiment, the aberration of starlight, and a number of other related experimental results come into agreement. The single objection to the hypothesis at that time was provided by astronomical observations of the motion of binary stars. The Ritz theory came to an end with the work of W. de Sitter (1913) who claimed to have a convincing argument for showing that the hypothesis of Ritz was inconsistent with the results of spectroscopic observations of binary stars. A hidden postulate in de Sitter’s argument, however, is that the speed of light propagating from the stars is not affected by anything. To refute de Sitter’s argument, it would be sufficient to assume that the speed of light adjusts to the value of c at the vicinity of Earth and other celestial bodies. The authors show that this assumption added to the Ritz hypothesis explains well spectroscopic observations of the binary stars. This combined hypothesis: the Ritz ballistic hypothesis and the adjustment of the speed of light to c near celestial bodies (in particular near the Earth), also explains experiments performed at CERN in 1964. An additional argument in favour of the suggested hypothesis is the derivation of the formula for the transverse Doppler Effect presented in this work.“ <\/span><\/p>\n

Lesen Sie bitte <\/span>hier<\/span><\/a><\/b><\/span> weiter!\u00a0
\nSiehe auch\u00a0hier: <\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Nina Sotina 2011 Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: 2394 weitere kritische Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen zur Erg\u00e4nzung der Dokumentation Textversion 1.2 \u2013 2004, Kapitel 4.\u00a0 The Ritz ballistic theory & adjusting the speed of light to c near the earth and other celestial bodies: NPA, Proceedings 2011, College Park, MD \/ Nina Sotina, Nadia Lvov. – [USA]: WWW […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3389","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-englischsprachige-kritik-der-relativitatstheorie"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3389"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3389"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3389\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3389"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3389"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3389"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}