{"id":3353,"date":"2013-05-03T04:43:21","date_gmt":"2013-05-03T03:43:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/?p=3353"},"modified":"2013-05-03T04:43:21","modified_gmt":"2013-05-03T03:43:21","slug":"an-astronomical-test-for-the-second-postulate-of-the-special-theory-of-relativity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/an-astronomical-test-for-the-second-postulate-of-the-special-theory-of-relativity\/","title":{"rendered":"An astronomical test for the second postulate of the special theory of relativity"},"content":{"rendered":"<dl class=\"clearfix fotol\" style=\"text-align: justify; width: 135px;\">\n<dt><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image- 1831\" style=\"text-align: justify; width: 135px;\" src=\"http:\/\/www.kritik-relativitaetstheorie.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/Bild-Joseph-Wayne-Smith.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/dt>\n<dt>\u00a0<\/dt>\n<\/dl>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><strong><\/strong>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><strong>By Juan J. Schulz Poquet <\/strong>2005<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><em>Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ekkehard-friebe.de\/Kap4_Erg_2012.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">2394 weitere kritische Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen <\/span><\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>zur Erg\u00e4nzung der <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kritik-relativitaetstheorie.de\/projekt-go-mueller\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">Dokumentation<\/span><\/a><\/strong> Textversion 1.2 \u2013 2004, Kapitel 4.\u00a0 <\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><strong>An astronomical test for the second postulate of the special theory of relativity<\/strong> \/ Juan J. Schulz Poquet. In: Apeiron. 12. 2005, No. 2, April, S. 228-255, &#8211; 28 S. = <a href=\"http:\/\/redshift.vif.com\/JournalFiles\/V12NO2PDF\/V12N2SCH.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">http:\/\/redshift.vif.com\/JournalFiles\/V12NO2PDF\/V12N2SCH.pdf<\/span><\/strong><\/a><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><strong>1. Introduction<br \/>\n<\/strong>Since their postulation a century ago, the formulas derived from Special Theory of Relativity (STR) have continued to demonstrate their effectiveness for the calculation of the magnitudes involved in dynamic phenomena of high velocities.\n<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><!--more-->The experimental results have so accurately fitted with those predicted by these formulas that it might appear extemporaneous and even ridiculous to propose the convenience of a new test for this famous theory. But my position is that this concordance does not imply the validity of its postulates but only their consequences, and hence provides a necessary but not a sufficient condition to constitute proof. Also, I am convinced that many scientists still hope for the appearance of an experiment that definitely proves the validity of the second postulate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">The reasons for this, which I develop below, are most likely as follows:<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">1) The basic postulate of STR is intrinsically illogical.<br \/>\n2) The empirical facts that supported the basic postulate at the time of its postulation are today questionable.<br \/>\n3) There is, to date, no unquestionable direct experimental proof.<br \/>\n4) It is possible to develop a theory, on a more logical basis, leading to similar formulas to those derived from the Relativity Theory.\n<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">Lesen Sie bitte <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/redshift.vif.com\/JournalFiles\/V12NO2PDF\/V12N2SCH.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">hier<\/span><\/a><\/strong> weiter!<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">Siehe auch: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/citeseerx.ist.psu.edu\/viewdoc\/summary?doi=10.1.1.71.8842\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">CiteSeer!<\/span><\/a><\/strong>\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0 \u00a0 By Juan J. Schulz Poquet 2005 Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: 2394 weitere kritische Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen zur Erg\u00e4nzung der Dokumentation Textversion 1.2 \u2013 2004, Kapitel 4.\u00a0 An astronomical test for the second postulate of the special theory of relativity \/ Juan J. Schulz Poquet. In: Apeiron. 12. 2005, No. 2, April, S. 228-255, &#8211; 28 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3353","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-englischsprachige-kritik-der-relativitatstheorie"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3353"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3353"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3353\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3353"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3353"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3353"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}