{"id":3340,"date":"2013-04-07T03:40:04","date_gmt":"2013-04-07T02:40:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/?p=3340"},"modified":"2013-04-07T03:40:04","modified_gmt":"2013-04-07T02:40:04","slug":"paradox-natural-mathematics-relativity-and-twentieth-century-ideas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/paradox-natural-mathematics-relativity-and-twentieth-century-ideas\/","title":{"rendered":"Paradox, natural mathematics, relativity and twentieth-century ideas"},"content":{"rendered":"<dl class=\"clearfix fotol\" style=\"text-align: justify; width: 135px;\">\n<dt><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image- 1831\" src=\"http:\/\/www.ekkehard-friebe.de\/bilder\/Bild-Carl-Benedicks.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"125\" height=\"175\" \/><\/dt>\n<\/dl>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><strong>By John Henry Ryskamp<\/strong> 2005 ca.<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><em>Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ekkehard-friebe.de\/Kap4_Erg_2012.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">2394 weitere kritische Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen <\/span><\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>zur Erg\u00e4nzung der <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kritik-relativitaetstheorie.de\/projekt-go-mueller\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">Dokumentation<\/span><\/a><\/strong> Textversion 1.2 \u2013 2004, Kapitel 4.\u00a0 <\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><strong>Paradox, natural mathematics, relativity and twentieth-century ideas<\/strong> \/ John Ryskamp.<br \/>\nIn: General science journal. 2005 ca. &#8211; 15 S. = <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wbabin.net\/science\/ryskamp.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">http:\/\/www.wbabin.net\/science\/ryskamp.pdf<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><strong>Introduction<br \/>\n<\/strong>New historical research shows that twentieth-century thought was expressed in terms of the \u201cnatural\u201d mathematics developed at the turn of the century in order to cope with the supposed \u201cparadoxes\u201d generated by Cantorian set theory.\n<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><!--more-->Economics, physics, biology\u00a0 &#8211;\u00a0 apparently no area of inquiry has escaped being made part of the \u201cnatural\u201d mathematics project. This mathematics asserts that mathematical formulations are inherently anomalous; the evidence of this is that they generate paradoxes. Therefore, the idea that mathematics is an aspect of human perception, must be made a part of mathematical formulations even though it plays no internally consistent role in any \u201cnatural\u201d mathematical formulation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">The role of \u201cnatural\u201d mathematics has gone unremarked for the very reason it was influential in the first place. Whether the researcher was the physicist Albert Einstein, the economist Piero Sraffa, the logician Kurt G\u00f6del, the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein, or the biologist Motoo Kimura, scientists in non-mathematics disciplines felt they were unable to express their ideas mathematically. This is the chief revelation of the new historical research, and a remarkable and unexpected (given the exalted reputations of these figures) unifying feature of twentieth-century intellectual history.<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">These thinkers had to search for appropriate mathematical terms in the latest mathematics of their day. They were unprepared to cope with the idea that flaws in the mathematics lodged errors in their theories. The current reexamination of the mathematics of the disciplines began with the revelation of the faulty approach taken to set theory by some of the chief proponents of \u201cnatural\u201d mathematics.<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">Lesen Sie bitte <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.wbabin.net\/science\/ryskamp.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">hier<\/span><\/a><\/strong> weiter!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By John Henry Ryskamp 2005 ca. Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: 2394 weitere kritische Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen zur Erg\u00e4nzung der Dokumentation Textversion 1.2 \u2013 2004, Kapitel 4.\u00a0 Paradox, natural mathematics, relativity and twentieth-century ideas \/ John Ryskamp. In: General science journal. 2005 ca. &#8211; 15 S. = http:\/\/www.wbabin.net\/science\/ryskamp.pdf Introduction New historical research shows that twentieth-century thought was expressed [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3340","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-englischsprachige-kritik-der-relativitatstheorie"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3340"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3340"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3340\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3340"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3340"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3340"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}