{"id":3286,"date":"2013-01-09T07:05:53","date_gmt":"2013-01-09T06:05:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/?p=3286"},"modified":"2013-01-09T07:05:53","modified_gmt":"2013-01-09T06:05:53","slug":"proof-relativity-is-illogical-2003-ca","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/proof-relativity-is-illogical-2003-ca\/","title":{"rendered":"Proof relativity is illogical (2003 ca.)"},"content":{"rendered":"<dl class=\"clearfix fotol\" style=\"text-align: justify; width: 135px;\">\n<dt><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image- 1831\" src=\"http:\/\/www.worldsci.org\/images\/members\/member_802.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"125\" height=\"175\" \/><\/dt>\n<\/dl>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">By <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.worldsci.org\/php\/index.php?tab0=Scientists&amp;tab1=Display&amp;id=802\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">John T. Nordberg<\/span><\/a><\/strong><em><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><em>Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ekkehard-friebe.de\/Kap4_Erg_2012.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">2394 weitere kritische Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen <\/span><\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>zur Erg\u00e4nzung der <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kritik-relativitaetstheorie.de\/projekt-go-mueller\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">Dokumentation<\/span><\/a><\/strong> Textversion 1.2 \u2013 2004, Kapitel 4.\u00a0 <\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><strong>Proof relativity is illogical<\/strong> \/<strong> John T. Nordberg , <\/strong>WWW 2003 ca., 4 S.<br \/>\nURL: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.grandunification.com\/hypertext\/Proof_Relativity_Illogical.html\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">http:\/\/www.grandunification.com\/hypertext\/Proof_Relativity_Illogical.html<\/span><\/a>\n<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><!--more-->Most scientific theories are supported inductively. While hundreds of experiments might seem to support a theory, it takes only one argument or experiment to prove a theory wrong. There are hundreds of physical experiments that match the predictions of Relativity. This does not mean Relativity has been &quot;proven&quot; or is a logically correct theory. For example, many of the so-called &quot;proofs&quot; of Relativity also could be described as &quot;proving&quot; the Ball-of-Light Particle Model.<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">This page provides a real &#8212; rock-solid &#8212; proof that Relativity contains a circular definition that is illogical and unresolvable. Relativity can not withstand this illogical circular definition. An alternative theory is needed to replace Relativity and explain the same observed physical phenomena.<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">[The alternative to Special Relativity is the Speed of Light Definition of Time. The alternative to General Relativity is the Ball of Light Particle Model. The Ball-of-Light Particle Model describes elementary particles and atomic nuclei as standing spherical waves of electromagnetic energy that create a central-pointing force called gravity. John T. Nordberg]<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">There are many areas of physics that are heatedly debated. But there is one area that seems fundamental and currently undisputed. That is the area of Basic Units.<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">Lesen Sie bitte <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.grandunification.com\/hypertext\/Proof_Relativity_Illogical.html\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">hier<\/span><\/a><\/strong> weiter!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0 By John T. Nordberg Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: 2394 weitere kritische Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen zur Erg\u00e4nzung der Dokumentation Textversion 1.2 \u2013 2004, Kapitel 4.\u00a0 Proof relativity is illogical \/ John T. Nordberg , WWW 2003 ca., 4 S. URL: http:\/\/www.grandunification.com\/hypertext\/Proof_Relativity_Illogical.html<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3286","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-englischsprachige-kritik-der-relativitatstheorie"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3286"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3286"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3286\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3286"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3286"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3286"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}