{"id":3253,"date":"2012-11-02T05:39:55","date_gmt":"2012-11-02T04:39:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/?p=3253"},"modified":"2012-11-02T05:39:55","modified_gmt":"2012-11-02T04:39:55","slug":"manifesto-of-grand-unified-field-theory-2002","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/manifesto-of-grand-unified-field-theory-2002\/","title":{"rendered":"Manifesto of grand unified field theory 2002"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\"\"<\/dt>\n<\/dl>\n

<\/strong>
\nBy Luo Maoquan <\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: 2394 weitere kritische Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen <\/span><\/a>
\n<\/strong>zur Erg\u00e4nzung der Dokumentation<\/span><\/a><\/strong> Textversion 1.2 \u2013 2004, Kapitel 4.\u00a0 <\/em><\/p>\n

Manifesto of grand unified field theory [in chines. Sprache] \/ Luo Maoquan. – [China]: Northwest Univ. Pr. 2002.
\nQuelle: Fu, Yuhua 2005 (Research and challenge), S. 59-60. [Referat in engl. Spr.]\n<\/p>\n

Y. Fu berichtet (S. 59-60): "Luo Maoquan … in the human scientific history firstly proposed the following propositions (in which including the thought collision with Professor Su Chengzhang, Beijing Aeronautical Institute):<\/p>\n

1, law of grand unified field theory: Denying inertia is all nature forces‘ origin with the pressure difference induced by the flow velocity difference of the elementary particle’s two sides fields. From this denying the universal gravitation theory in which the force and the material object are separated and denying the theory of relativity in which the field has not the material object.
\n2, indicated the carrier of positive charge and negative charge only is the helix with the difference of laevorotatory and dextrorotary, has tallied the experiment fact that in bubble chamber the tracks of positive charge and negative charge are laevorotatory helix and dextrorotary helix. Explaining a series of electromagnetisms experiment law with this model.
\n3, from the Kepler’s third law to derive nine celestial mechanics equations again, may contend with the law of universal gravitation and the general theory of relativity in the computation aspect, but actually found the physical mechanism.
\n4, discovered Luo Maoquan’s tenth law: A wirelike non-linear elastomer that one section is fixed and another end is acted by variable force, then in three-dimensional space the moving tracks of all the on-line mass points all are the position-like shapes. This law already passed through the appraisal.
\n5, discovered Einstein’s absurd mathematical logic in the reasoning process of relativity effect.
\n6, treating ether as the absolute rest system, the universal gravitation theory in which the force and the material object are separated and the theory of relativity in which the field has not the material object, all are the distortion stating of theology, has caused the human soul (namely spirit) disaster.
\n7, the monograph "Manifesto of Grand Unified Field Theory" published in 2002 by Northwest Industrial University Press, it is the representative work.
\n8, in the human scientific history firstly explained the celestial body’s movement force, the electromagnetic force, the nuclear force and the weak force are only the different categories of an essential.
\n9, for the first time comprehensively explained: Ampere’s law, Faraday’s law, Maxwell equations, Coulomb’s law, Lorentz force, the phenomenon that for two poles of magnet, two like poles repel each other and two unlike poles attract each other, and so on.
\n10, to challenge a series of theories: such as black hole theory, universal big bang theory, light’s particle theory and so on."<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Luo Maoquan Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: 2394 weitere kritische Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen zur Erg\u00e4nzung der Dokumentation Textversion 1.2 \u2013 2004, Kapitel 4.\u00a0 Manifesto of grand unified field theory [in chines. Sprache] \/ Luo Maoquan. – [China]: Northwest Univ. Pr. 2002. Quelle: Fu, Yuhua 2005 (Research and challenge), S. 59-60. [Referat in engl. Spr.]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3253","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-englischsprachige-kritik-der-relativitatstheorie"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3253"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3253"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3253\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3253"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3253"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3253"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}