{"id":3239,"date":"2012-10-06T05:23:44","date_gmt":"2012-10-06T04:23:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/?p=3239"},"modified":"2012-10-06T05:23:44","modified_gmt":"2012-10-06T04:23:44","slug":"time-is-not-relative-2002","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/time-is-not-relative-2002\/","title":{"rendered":"Time is not relative 2002"},"content":{"rendered":"<dl class=\"clearfix fotol\" style=\"text-align: justify; width: 135px;\">\n<dt><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image- 1831\" src=\"http:\/\/www.worldsci.org\/images\/members\/NoPhoto150.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"125\" height=\"175\" \/><\/dt>\n<\/dl>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><strong>By Nicu Joica<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><em>Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ekkehard-friebe.de\/Kap4_Erg_2012.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">2394 weitere kritische Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen <\/span><\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>zur Erg\u00e4nzung der <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kritik-relativitaetstheorie.de\/projekt-go-mueller\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">Dokumentation<\/span><\/a><\/strong> Textversion 1.2 \u2013 2004, Kapitel 4.\u00a0 <\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><strong>Time is not relative:<\/strong> [datiert: 29.12.02] \/ N. Joica. In: The general science journal. 2002\u00a0 =<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/wbabin.net\/physics\/time.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">http:\/\/wbabin.net\/physics\/time.pdf<\/span><\/strong><\/a><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">\u00a0<br \/>\n<\/span><\/strong>Auszug. &#8211; &quot;In Relativity, mistakenly, the time passes slower for the observer who is in motion relative to a reference frame, no matter if the observer is moving closer of farther apart from the observer at rest.\n<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><!--more-->CONCLUSION &#8211; Relations (1) and (2) do not tell us how time flows for the moving observer, but only for the fixed observer. (Understanding this optical illusion indicates we should be more careful in our assumptions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">For example, a star sends out light with a constant frequency. Depending on the direction of movement, we observe that when the star is moving away, the light will suffer a displacement towards the red end of the spectrum (the frequency of light is getting smaller).<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">When the star is getting closer, light will be displaced towards the violet (the frequency of the light is growing).<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">According to this example, we can say that if the frequency of the light that we took as a standard unit of time varies with the direction of relative motion.<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">OBSERVATION &#8211; In the same way we can demonstrate that in every relation where we use alpha, it must be replaced with the general relation (2) and then we can calculate how the measurements will be perceived from the inertial system at rest. An exception to this rule might be when trying to express the height. It is possible that the height may vary with speed considering the ether as an absolute fixed reference frame.&quot;<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">Lesen Sie bitte <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/wbabin.net\/physics\/time.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">hier<\/span><\/a><\/strong> weiter!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Nicu Joica Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: 2394 weitere kritische Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen zur Erg\u00e4nzung der Dokumentation Textversion 1.2 \u2013 2004, Kapitel 4.\u00a0 Time is not relative: [datiert: 29.12.02] \/ N. Joica. In: The general science journal. 2002\u00a0 = http:\/\/wbabin.net\/physics\/time.pdf\u00a0 Auszug. &#8211; &quot;In Relativity, mistakenly, the time passes slower for the observer who is in motion relative [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3239","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-englischsprachige-kritik-der-relativitatstheorie"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3239"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3239"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3239\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3239"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3239"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3239"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}