{"id":3203,"date":"2012-07-29T05:31:52","date_gmt":"2012-07-29T04:31:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/?p=3203"},"modified":"2012-07-29T05:31:52","modified_gmt":"2012-07-29T04:31:52","slug":"failure-of-modern-physics-2000","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/failure-of-modern-physics-2000\/","title":{"rendered":"Failure of modern physics 2000"},"content":{"rendered":"<dl class=\"clearfix fotol\" style=\"text-align: justify; width: 135px;\">\n<dt><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image- 1831\" src=\"http:\/\/www.worldsci.org\/images\/members\/member_14.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"125\" height=\"175\" \/><\/dt>\n<\/dl>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><strong>\u00a0By <\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.worldsci.org\/php\/index.php?tab0=Scientists&amp;tab1=Display&amp;id=14\" target=\"_blank\"><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">James DeMeo<\/span><\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><em>Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ekkehard-friebe.de\/Kap4_Erg_2012.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">2394 weitere kritische Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen <\/span><\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>zur Erg\u00e4nzung der <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kritik-relativitaetstheorie.de\/projekt-go-mueller\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">Dokumentation<\/span><\/a><\/strong> Textversion 1.2 \u2013 2004, Kapitel 4. <\/em>\n<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><strong>Failure of modern physics<\/strong>: Email, 3.10.2000, von James DeMeo &lt;demeo@mind.net&gt; \/ James DeMeo. 2 S.<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">URL: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cartesio-episteme.net\/demeo.htm\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">www.cartesio-episteme.net\/demeo.htm<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><!--more-->S. 1: &quot;The M-M experiment is constantly misrepresented in orthodox physics circles, and even by well-meaning critical theorists. The M-M experiment is not the most definitive on the subject, that honour going to Dayton Miller, who factually detected an Earth-entrained dynamic aether, and published on the subject his work covering several decades.<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">M-M undertook their work with a relatively primitive apparatus as compared to Miller, and they used it for a grand total of only 6 hours of data-taking (only 36 turns of the interferometer). Even so, they did register a SMALL EFFECT, and not the &quot;null&quot; as widely misreported.<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">Miller, by comparison, used a far more sensitive apparatus, with a total of 12,500 turns of the device over many years. He plotted the net aether-drift at different seasonal epochs, SOMETHING M-M SAID THEY NEEDED TO DO before giving their own work any significance, BUT WHICH IN FACT THEY NEVER DID.<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">Miller&#8217;s work was never rebutted scientifically, but was instead subject to silent treatment, and basically ignored until after his death. Then the corpse was mutilated.<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">Basically, there was a disturbing unethical misrepresentation of Miller&#8217;s data, a political destruction of his work which was undertaken by Shankland, et al, in the same journal which published Miller&#8217;s original findings (Reviews of Modern Physics).&quot;<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">Lesen Sie bitte <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.cartesio-episteme.net\/demeo.htm\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">hier<\/span><\/a><\/strong> weiter!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0By James DeMeo Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: 2394 weitere kritische Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen zur Erg\u00e4nzung der Dokumentation Textversion 1.2 \u2013 2004, Kapitel 4. Failure of modern physics: Email, 3.10.2000, von James DeMeo &lt;demeo@mind.net&gt; \/ James DeMeo. 2 S. URL: www.cartesio-episteme.net\/demeo.htm<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3203","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-englischsprachige-kritik-der-relativitatstheorie"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3203"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3203"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3203\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3203"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3203"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3203"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}