{"id":3197,"date":"2012-07-19T07:19:45","date_gmt":"2012-07-19T06:19:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/?p=3197"},"modified":"2012-07-19T07:19:45","modified_gmt":"2012-07-19T06:19:45","slug":"recent-developments-in-the-relativistic-electrodynamics-controversy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/recent-developments-in-the-relativistic-electrodynamics-controversy\/","title":{"rendered":"Recent developments in the relativistic electrodynamics controversy"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\"\"<\/dt>\n<\/dl>\n

By Gianfranco Spavieri<\/span><\/a>, <\/strong>Miguel Rodr\u00edguez and Edgar Moreno<\/p>\n

Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: 2394 weitere kritische Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen <\/span><\/a>
\n<\/strong>zur Erg\u00e4nzung der Dokumentation<\/span><\/a><\/strong> Textversion 1.2 \u2013 2004, Kapitel 4. <\/em>\n<\/p>\n

Recent developments in the relativistic electrodynamics controversy 2002<\/strong><\/p>\n

In: Episteme. An international journal of science, history and philosophy.
\nNr. 6, Parte 2. 2002, 21. Dez., ca. 13 S. =
\nhttp:\/\/itis.volta.alessandria.it\/episteme\/ep6\/ep6-II.htm<\/span><\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

Ausz\u00fcge:<\/strong> "Abstract. – In this paper we consider the controversial facets of two tests that are supposed to show experimental evidence against the accepted standard electrodynamics based on special relativity. The first refers to the detection of longitudinal electromagnetic forces in current carrying conductors, and the second represents a modified version of the Trouton-Noble experiment for which a non-null result has been found. Although the first test is inconclusive, the positive result of the second, if it is really such, is surprisingly in agreement with standard electrodynamics.
\n[…]
\nThis is a scientific controversy between physicists in favour of the standard relativistic interpretation of classical electrodynamics and physicists that favour an approach to electrodynamics based on coordinate transformations different from the Lorentz transformations and, thus, negate the validity of special relativity.
\n[…]
\nBefore going into the details, we would like to make a general comment on the reliability of the papers that deal with this type of conflicting aspects of fundaments of physics. As it has been remarked by several epistemologists and experts in the philosophy of science, most physicists assume spontaneously a partial position in these discussions. The remark is that some experimentalists are tempted to, and in fact do, try to arrange the experimental set up in such a way that the data are trimmed or slightly modified in favour of expected or desired results, which would corroborate their own visions or theories. Moreover, it is not uncommon to find out that theoreticians may have selected from the existing theory formulas or partial approaches that lead to a theoretical result in agreement with their vision, most of the times neglecting "unintentionally" other formulas or approaches that would lead to opposite or different results."
\n[…]
\nSome physicists, either in favour the official, standard view of accepted theories or not, assume generally a rigid and dogmatic attitude that often prevents discussion and advances. Sometimes this attitude prevents the research of issues that later are recognized as real fundamental unsolved problems of modern physics."\n<\/p>\n

Lesen Sie bitte hier<\/span><\/a><\/strong> weiter!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Gianfranco Spavieri, Miguel Rodr\u00edguez and Edgar Moreno Beitrag aus dem GOM-Projekt: 2394 weitere kritische Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen zur Erg\u00e4nzung der Dokumentation Textversion 1.2 \u2013 2004, Kapitel 4. Recent developments in the relativistic electrodynamics controversy 2002 In: Episteme. An international journal of science, history and philosophy. Nr. 6, Parte 2. 2002, 21. Dez., ca. 13 S. = […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3197","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-englischsprachige-kritik-der-relativitatstheorie"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3197"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3197"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3197\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3197"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3197"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3197"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}