{"id":3157,"date":"2012-04-27T05:42:55","date_gmt":"2012-04-27T04:42:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/?p=3157"},"modified":"2012-04-27T05:42:55","modified_gmt":"2012-04-27T04:42:55","slug":"how-the-laws-of-physics-lie","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/how-the-laws-of-physics-lie\/","title":{"rendered":"How the Laws of Physics Lie"},"content":{"rendered":"<dl class=\"clearfix fotol\" style=\"text-align: justify; width: 135px;\">\n<dt><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image- 1831\" src=\"http:\/\/www.ekkehard-friebe.de\/bilder\/Buchcover Nancy Cartwright.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"125\" height=\"175\" \/><\/dt>\n<\/dl>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">By <a href=\"http:\/\/www.goodreads.com\/author\/show\/1868750.Nancy_Cartwright\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">Nancy Cartwright<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/a>\u00a0<br \/>\n<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.de\/How-Laws-Physics-Nancy-Cartwright\/dp\/0198247044\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">amazon<\/span> <\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">In this sequence of philosophical essays about natural science, Nancy Cartwright argues that fundamental explanatory laws, the deepest and most admired successes of modern physics, do not in fact describe the regularities that exist in nature. Yet she is not `anti-realist&#8216;. Rather, she draws a novel distinction, arguing that theoretical entities, and the complex and localized laws that describe them, can be interpreted realistically, but that the simple unifying laws of basic theory cannot.<br \/>\n\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->Paperback, 230 pages<br \/>\nPublished July 7th 1983 by Oxford University Press, USA\u00a0<br \/>\nISBN 0198247044 (ISBN13: 9780198247043)<br \/>\nedition language: English<br \/>\noriginal title: How the Laws of Physics Lie<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Nancy Cartwright\u00a0 amazon In this sequence of philosophical essays about natural science, Nancy Cartwright argues that fundamental explanatory laws, the deepest and most admired successes of modern physics, do not in fact describe the regularities that exist in nature. Yet she is not `anti-realist&#8216;. Rather, she draws a novel distinction, arguing that theoretical entities, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3157","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-englischsprachige-kritik-der-relativitatstheorie"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3157"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3157"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3157\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3157"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3157"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3157"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}