{"id":3139,"date":"2012-03-26T10:25:28","date_gmt":"2012-03-26T09:25:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/?p=3139"},"modified":"2012-03-26T10:25:28","modified_gmt":"2012-03-26T09:25:28","slug":"three-dimensional-geometric-acceleration-time-gravity-temperature-and-solid-state","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/three-dimensional-geometric-acceleration-time-gravity-temperature-and-solid-state\/","title":{"rendered":"Three dimensional geometric acceleration, time, gravity, temperature and solid state"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\"\"<\/dt>\n<\/dl>\n

By Victor de Botton<\/strong> – January 2012<\/p>\n

Introduction
\n<\/strong>The present dissertation makes use of mathematics to supply alternative unified quantitative solutions all compatible between them. The first step is a correction of an existing vector equation. The next step is a geometric time definition to create a comprehensive geometric system independent on any assumed time variable defined externally from geometry. A geometric centre-spherical gravity equation is further developed from existing mathematic equations and is implemented to solve problems evolving from experimentally seemingly incompatible to one another results and to supply explanations to each, making use of purely mathematic parameters: length and geometric time.<\/p>\n

Issues dealt with:\u00a0
\n– Dynamic acceleration in a three dimensions independent corrected equation
\n– Geometric time, non conservative quantic and apparently conservative behaviours
\n– Paradoxes like \u201celectric weight\u201d, \u201cneutrons non rectilinear falling\u201d
\n– Centre-spherical acceleration and geometric gravity equation
\n– Mathematic independent and precise gravity profile around Earth
\n– Red shift, black radiation and holes, sunspots and C.M.B.
\n– Coupling, super fluid, superconducting, solid state, geometric temperature
\n– Maintenance, transient and supernovae with geometric gravity
\n– Northward migration of continents, the Pacific Ring of Fire, Gulf Stream, Nin\u00f5, Nin\u00e3 and similar, magnetic field on Earth, the hole in the ozone layer at the Southern pole
\n– etc.<\/p>\n

Geometric developments and theorems using rotating and translating \u201cpoints\u201d and the relationships between them are here independently developed. The mathematic existence of such points is mathematically sustained and explained. Questions will be asked after the demonstrations about the nature of the points. After the mathematic demonstrations, actual entities can be identified.\u00a0<\/p>\n

[\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026]\u00a0<\/p>\n

Conclusions
\n<\/strong>Mathematics would best describe Nature\u2019s behaviour. Geometric time definition is the only way to avoid uncontrollable superposition of events, so is the prime number progression constraint to frequency. Mathematic developments like equations (1) and (2) cannot be disregarded and replaced by assumptions like the mass law assumption\/decision and the C light velocity political decision.\n<\/p>\n

Mathematic gravity is not proportional to the inverse of the square of the radius, a never validated but always applied assumption together with mass, never actually measured.<\/p>\n

Two political \u201claws\u201d rule the passive \u201cscientific community\u201d for over two centuries:\u00a0
\n– The mass law Notice the juridical term, never demonstrated.
\n– The C=constant law Recent experiments (CERN 2011) could finally give a good reason to discard the law altogether, together with its very brilliant PR conclusions like linear relativity.\n<\/p>\n

History The inverse square \u201claw\u201d was used mainly for its easiness to absorb any discrepancy, never demonstrated with the excuse that Earth\u2019s mass was too large to make measurements reliable. The \u201celectric mass\u201d mathematic equation, as quoted in old books for electric charges, was verified and induced by similarity excuse.<\/p>\n

\u201cMasses\u201d were granted and distributed all around starting from Sir Isaac Newton\u2019s apple and an un-demonstrated equation, furthering to atoms, stars and galaxies with no great danger of contradictions, and especially for being conservative thus reversible, not too or at all committing. \u201cWeighed masses\u201d are in fact measured accelerations required to move the de Coriolis average acceleration of any collection of transformable points.<\/p>\n

The C law was decided upon by heavy pressure from wave mechanics experts who needed \u201can ether\u201d. Afterwards, they further needed \u201can ether wind\u201d and as it seems, the M&M experiment\/s could well have been encouraged\/financed by them.<\/p>\n

The long series of M&M experiments, each and everyone never absolutely negative, all containing a positive residuum to the change of velocity of light, could not be really invoked.<\/p>\n

Mirrors in all experiments were taken as \u201cgeometric mirrors\u201d, as at the time, optics were divided until the second half of the twentieth century into \u201cgeometric optics\u201d and \u201cphysical optics\u201d. Mirrors were never thought of as new sources although with a refractive index of \u20131 they should not have been neglected, for at the same time refractive indices of gases in the experiments were very much accounted for and required proliferation of mirrors to keep experiments in small volumes of gas for control.<\/p>\n

Experimental difficulties indeed existed but they could not be used as excuses.<\/p>\n

– The first M&M experiment included only one mirror at half ways (50%) and actually yielded a 50% positive result, unequivocally meaning that light can change its velocity but was overruled intentionally.<\/p>\n

– All further experiments along the M&M pattern always <\/strong>produced positive <\/strong>results but smaller and smaller and never negative <\/strong>even after introducing 17 mirrors in the experiment. On purely statistical grounds, this should have awakened some doubts about its conclusions but politics… Anyway the \u201cdecision\u201d to keep velocity of light constant erected a very heavy stumbling block on the way to real scientific and sound judgement development on a great deal of other matters depending on the decision.<\/p>\n

– New evidence, as of Tuesday, March 30, 2011 from the globe of the European Organization for Nuclear Research, CERN, the very centre of the original decision in Switzerland, could finally give a strong enough blow to the political decision.<\/p>\n

The matter is to be dealt about again using the definition of geometric time.<\/p>\n

– Elsewhere a democratic \u201cballot\u201d (politics) had to \u201cdecide\u201d whether Pluto is a planet or not with no one of the three thousand voters really knowing for sure or even trying to understand what they \u201csee\u201d. By the way, all is well with Pluto.<\/p>\n

Mechanical engineering wise, the size of the \u201ccontroller\u201d needed to put together the quantity of controllable points in space according to equation (1), puts a heavy philosophical burden and a very profound respect to this very controlled Universe.<\/p>\n

\u201cTheories\u201d, human assumptions, cannot compete with mathematic\/philosophic reliability.<\/p>\n

Equation (3) puts the control distance equal to 0 as the gravity acceleration from to 1000000 suns from one side of the Milky Way is almost instant, more precisely one scan time of the most frequent point in the system, transmitted to the opposite side over everyone\u2019s head and 10 billion light-years far.<\/p>\n

This seemingly unsolvable by immediate visual assess feature\/paradox, is resolved by the intrinsically relative\/reciprocal requirement: Universe has rotated and translated around and along the one transformable point, and as such has recorded full information of the point new relative position. This is the \u201cbeauty of geometry\u201d so much admired by Sir Isaac Newton and should be admired by all as well and should replace the \u201cyou see you believe\u201d concept.<\/p>\n

Lesen Sie bitte hier<\/span><\/a><\/strong> weiter!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Victor de Botton – January 2012 Introduction The present dissertation makes use of mathematics to supply alternative unified quantitative solutions all compatible between them. The first step is a correction of an existing vector equation. The next step is a geometric time definition to create a comprehensive geometric system independent on any assumed time […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3139","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-englischsprachige-kritik-der-relativitatstheorie"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3139"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3139"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3139\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3139"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3139"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3139"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}