{"id":3020,"date":"2011-08-22T08:37:07","date_gmt":"2011-08-22T07:37:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/?p=3020"},"modified":"2011-08-23T09:26:08","modified_gmt":"2011-08-23T08:26:08","slug":"the-notion-of-time-in-special-relativity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/the-notion-of-time-in-special-relativity\/","title":{"rendered":"THE NOTION OF TIME IN SPECIAL RELATIVITY"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><strong>THE NOTION OF TIME IN SPECIAL RELATIVITY<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/geosimlab.tau.ac.il\/?cmd=people\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">Yefim Bakman<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/strong>and <strong>Boris Pogorelsky<\/strong>\n<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\">In arXiv.org &#8211; Physics &#8211; arXiv:physics\/0701109\u00a0 &#8211;\u00a0 09.01.2007<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><strong>Abstract<\/strong>. Even though the concepts of time and space are basic concepts of physics, they have not been vouchsafed a constructive definition. As to space, this is no wonder because a correct notion of space cannot be formed in the frame of the existing physical paradigm.<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><!--more-->We intend to discuss this problem in another article. However, a definition of time can be given on the basis of the simple principle that <strong>each physical magnitude constitutes a feature of some physical carrier<\/strong> (Costa, 1987). This article deals with identifying that carrier for the feature \u201ctime\u201d. Finally this article affirms that because of the lack of a definition of time some physical experiments have been erroneously interpreted as signs of time dilation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/ftp\/physics\/papers\/0701\/0701109.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">Den ganzen Beitrag lesen<\/span> <\/a>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>THE NOTION OF TIME IN SPECIAL RELATIVITY Yefim Bakman\u00a0and Boris Pogorelsky In arXiv.org &#8211; Physics &#8211; arXiv:physics\/0701109\u00a0 &#8211;\u00a0 09.01.2007 Abstract. Even though the concepts of time and space are basic concepts of physics, they have not been vouchsafed a constructive definition. As to space, this is no wonder because a correct notion of space cannot [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3020","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-englischsprachige-kritik-der-relativitatstheorie"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3020"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3020"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3020\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3020"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3020"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3020"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}