{"id":2677,"date":"2009-12-02T07:17:21","date_gmt":"2009-12-02T06:17:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/?p=2677"},"modified":"2009-12-02T07:17:21","modified_gmt":"2009-12-02T06:17:21","slug":"paul-marmet-%e2%80%9cthe-collapse-of-the-lorentz-transformation%e2%80%9d","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/paul-marmet-%e2%80%9cthe-collapse-of-the-lorentz-transformation%e2%80%9d\/","title":{"rendered":"Paul Marmet: \u201cThe Collapse of the Lorentz Transformation\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"

Zur Erg\u00e4nzung der Ausf\u00fchrungen von G\u00fcnther Baer<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/a> in dem Beitrag:
\n4.6 Das undefinierbare \u201cInertialsystem\u201d und die Ursache der Tr\u00e4gheit<\/span><\/a>\u00a0
\n<\/strong>aus dem Buch: \u201cSPUR eines JAHRHUNDERTIRRTUMS\u201d
\nbringe ich nachstehend eine Arbeit von Professor Dr. Paul Marmet<\/span><\/a>,<\/strong> Kanada.<\/p>\n

Zitat:
\n<\/strong>The Collapse of the Lorentz Transformation<\/span><\/a><\/strong>
\n<\/span>Paul Marmet\u00a0 –\u00a0 The Breakdown of the Lorentz Transformation<\/em><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Abstract.<\/strong>
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Following the observation that the velocity of light with respect to a moving observer appears constant in all frames, independently of the velocity of the moving frame, Lorentz proposed a transformation of coordinates of space and time to allow for the velocity of the moving frame.\u00a0 However, we show that the solution found by Lorentz, does not lead to a constant velocity of light.\u00a0 On the contrary, we show that the Lorentz solution is an average velocity between light traveling in two directions, and that the velocity of light in each direction is never equal to the velocity c just as with the Galilean coordinates.\u00a0 The difference between the Galilean transformation and the Lorentz transformation is that, in the latter, the average velocity is constant after two light paths, traveling in opposites directions.\u00a0 This result is certainly not compatible with the general definition of a velocity in physics.\u00a0<\/p>\n

We also present a numerical example to the Lorentz transformation, which confirms that the velocity of light is not constant for the observer in the moving frame.\u00a0 After calculating that the constant velocity of light is not compatible with the Lorentz transformations, we see that no other acceptable mathematical functions can solve that problem of a constant one-way velocity of light in all directions, unless the time and length dilation factors change with the direction light is traveling.\u00a0 Such a solution is not acceptable in physics.\u00a0 A realistic solution is found in compatibility with a new interpretation of the Michelson-Morley experiment, in which secondary phenomena are taken into account.\u00a0 We can see how the constant velocity of light in a moving frame is only apparent.\u00a0 It is found that an isotropic length dilation or contraction (? times) coupled with the usual slowing down of clocks (? times) leads to a complete realistic solution of the problem compatible with all observational data.\u00a0
\n\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 1 – Lorentz Transformation.<\/strong>
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The Lorentz transformations (1)<\/span> <\/a>published in 1904, were first discovered by Woldemar Voigt in 1887 when studying the elastic theory of light, even if they are generally attributed to Lorentz.\u00a0 Joseph Larmor (2)<\/span> <\/a>arrived at the same conclusion in 1900 and also Henri Poincar\u00e9 in 1905.\u00a0 The aim of the Lorentz transformations (1)<\/span><\/a> is to calculate the relationships between the lengths and time units between a frame supposedly at rest and another frame in motion, assuming that the same velocity of light is measured in both frames.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n

(Zitatende) <\/strong><\/p>\n

Lesen Sie bitte hier<\/span><\/a><\/strong> weiter!<\/p>\n

Beste Gr\u00fc\u00dfe Ekkehard Friebe<\/span><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Zur Erg\u00e4nzung der Ausf\u00fchrungen von G\u00fcnther Baer in dem Beitrag: 4.6 Das undefinierbare \u201cInertialsystem\u201d und die Ursache der Tr\u00e4gheit\u00a0 aus dem Buch: \u201cSPUR eines JAHRHUNDERTIRRTUMS\u201d bringe ich nachstehend eine Arbeit von Professor Dr. Paul Marmet, Kanada. Zitat: The Collapse of the Lorentz Transformation Paul Marmet\u00a0 –\u00a0 The Breakdown of the Lorentz Transformation \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Abstract. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2677","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-englischsprachige-kritik-der-relativitatstheorie"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2677"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2677"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2677\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2677"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2677"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2677"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}