{"id":2672,"date":"2009-11-27T02:02:11","date_gmt":"2009-11-27T01:02:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/?p=2672"},"modified":"2009-11-27T02:02:11","modified_gmt":"2009-11-27T01:02:11","slug":"henning-lundsgart-%e2%80%9cthe-theory-of-big-bang-a-mistake-build-on-wrong-precondition%e2%80%9d","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/henning-lundsgart-%e2%80%9cthe-theory-of-big-bang-a-mistake-build-on-wrong-precondition%e2%80%9d\/","title":{"rendered":"Henning Lundsgart: \u201cThe Theory of Big Bang – a mistake build on wrong precondition\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"

Mit Bezug auf den Beitrag:
\nHenning Lundsgart: \u201c<\/strong>The Theory of Relativity \u2013 a mistake build on wrong precondition<\/span><\/a><\/strong>\u201d<\/strong>
\n<\/strong>bringe ich nachstehend eine weitere Arbeit von Henning Lundsgart, <\/strong>D\u00e4nemark 2005.<\/p>\n

Zitat: <\/strong><\/p>\n

The Theory of Big Bang<\/span><\/a>\u00a0
\n<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 a mistake build on wrong precondition \u2014<\/p>\n

Introduction
\n<\/strong>The theory of Big Bang is about the creation and the expansion of the Universe. According to this theory, it all started with a very small object, far smaller then a pinhead, which exploded and send its contents out in all directions. This explosion is called Big Bang, and from the contents of this the whole known Universe with stars and globes came into being. The proof that the Universe came into being this way and still expand is to be found in a displacement of the spectral lines in the starlight, towards the red end of the spectrum, and called redshift.<\/p>\n

This redshift is linear increasing with the distance to the galaxies as shown by Edwin P. Hubble (1929), and taken as a proof that the stars have a velocity outwards (Smoot and Davidson 1993). However, below it should be shown, that the redshift is caused by an intrinsic atomar change of frequency and the primary explosion Big Bang never took place.<\/p>\n

Overlooked problems
\n<\/strong>Einstein (1960, p. 69) calls his Universe Minkowskis 4-dimensional world. To explain what that is Einstein begins with a 3-dimensional spherical space borrowed from Bernhard Riemann (1826-1866) :<\/p>\n

From one point is drawn straight lines (or stretched cords) in all directions. All lines or cords have the length r. And all free ends will therefore lay on a spherical (ball-shaped) surface with r as radius. The spherical surface has a certain size F. \u00a0If the world is euclidean then F = 4?r2<\/sup>, but if the world is spherical, then the spherical surface will always be less then 4?r2<\/sup>. When the lines is extended the spherical surface will increase with decreasing tendency until it has reach a maximum, determined by The Worldradius R. If the lines are still increasing, the spherical surface beginns to decrease, and eventually be zero, when all the lines (radii) meet in an Opposite Point.
\nA spherical space (or world) like this has a finite volume V, determined by radius R. Thus V = 2?2<\/sup>R3<\/sup>. Yet the space has no boundaries.\n<\/p>\n

Einstein says at last:<\/p>\n

From what is said it appears, that closed spaces without limits is thinkable. Among those distinguish the spherical (respectively the elliptical) itself by simplicity, as all its points are equal.<\/p>\n

Thus we here have a spherical space of a finite size. It has no surface and there is no point, which can be said to be a centre, because all points are equal. However a spherical space with neither surface nor centre is unlikely outside the world of mathematics. It defy common everyday experience and logic.
\nThis space is now supplied with a fourth dimension, which not only is the time, as it popularly is said. The fourth dimension is corresponding to the relativity theory \u00a0x4<\/sub>= ict (Einstein 1960, p.76)\u00a0That means the velocity of light (c) is to be multiplied with the time (t) which gives a number of kilometres, as the seconds are cancelled out. This result also has to be multiplied with (i), which represents the square root of minus one. Then as a final result the 4th dimension is a number of imaginary kilometres, which no one can neither imagine nor understand. It is irrational, and thus evidence that the theory is wrong. Notwithstanding, this space is the universe of Big Bang.
\nAccording to the Theory of Big Bang, this universe was initiated as a socalled entity exploded. Out of the explosion products, which was thrown out in all directions, emerged the whole inconceiveable large\u00a0Universe, still growing bigger and bigger!
\nWhen all points in the Universe in agreement with the theory are equal, we should see galaxies that in the same way drift apart each other, no matter where we are and in which direction we are looking.
\nIn the meantime, a\u00a0sphere with neither centre nor surface defy nevertheless common everyday experience and logic. The\u00a04th dimension\u00a0is not only imaginary, it is irrational.<\/p>\n

Since 1970 the american astronomer professor Ph.D. William G. Tifft and some others have investigated these distance-dependent redshift, and it is now beyond doubt, that the redshift is quantized. Tifft (1984, p.502) wrote in Astrophysical Journal:\n<\/p>\n

The overall consistency and very high statistical confidence levels leave little room for doubt about the quantized nature of the redshift, both globally and within physical systems. \u00a0<\/p>\n

In Sky & Telescope (Tifft 1987, p.31):<\/p>\n

No matter what interpretation is attached to it, the evidence for redshift quantization will not vanish by being ignored.<\/p>\n

And in Astrophysic and Space Science (Tifft1995, p.31):<\/p>\n

Tifft (1977a) demonstrated that Local Group galaxies were periodically distributed in redshift at 72 km per second \u00a0when galactocentric corrections were applied. Arp (1986) confirmed and extended the work using an independent solar motion determination. Napier et. al. (1988) further verified the periodicity. Since the Local Group is a physical group, quantization at this level is a three-dimensional generalization of the differential work in pairs and groups. The analysis shows the significance of the transformation to the galactic center. To extend the quantization linkage between groups, Tifft (1977a) went on to show that the redshift pattern in the external M101 group was apparently in phase with the Local group. The intergroup phasing was then extended out to the Coma cluster to provide an accurate estimate of the periodicity, (72,46 \u00b1\u00a0\u00a00,5 km per second), assuming a global scale for linked redshift states.<\/p>\n

And in Astrophysic and Space Science (Tifft 1995, p.36 and p.37, line 24):<\/p>\n

A question often asked when quantized redshift are discussed is ‚is there any connection with the Cosmic Background Radiation?‘ The answer to this is now yes. When redshifts are transformed to the CBR rest frame using the COBE cosmic dipole velocity and apex, widespread quantization is seen at the original 72 km per second \u00a0period.
\nThere are now two frames which produce quantization, both involving apparent velocity transformations. There are indications that the CBR reference is widely applicable. The galactic reference may be more local.\n<\/p>\n

(Zitatende) <\/strong><\/p>\n

Lesen Sie bitte hier<\/span><\/a><\/strong> weiter!<\/p>\n

Beste Gr\u00fc\u00dfe Ekkehard Friebe<\/span><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Mit Bezug auf den Beitrag: Henning Lundsgart: \u201cThe Theory of Relativity \u2013 a mistake build on wrong precondition\u201d bringe ich nachstehend eine weitere Arbeit von Henning Lundsgart, D\u00e4nemark 2005. Zitat: The Theory of Big Bang\u00a0 \u00a0\u2014 a mistake build on wrong precondition \u2014 Introduction The theory of Big Bang is about the creation and the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2672","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-englischsprachige-kritik-der-relativitatstheorie"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2672"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2672"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2672\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2672"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2672"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2672"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}