{"id":2650,"date":"2009-10-31T11:47:24","date_gmt":"2009-10-31T10:47:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/?p=2650"},"modified":"2009-11-17T11:46:31","modified_gmt":"2009-11-17T10:46:31","slug":"walter-babin-%e2%80%9cspecial-relativity-and-the-sagnac-effect%e2%80%9d","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/walter-babin-%e2%80%9cspecial-relativity-and-the-sagnac-effect%e2%80%9d\/","title":{"rendered":"Walter Babin: \u201cSpecial Relativity and the Sagnac Effect\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"

Nachstehend bringe ich einen weiteren Beitrag von Walter Babin<\/span><\/a>:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Zitat: <\/strong><\/p>\n

Special Relativity and the Sagnac Effect<\/span><\/a>
\n<\/strong>Copyright \u00a9 Walter Babin, Update Sept. 10, 2002\n<\/p>\n

The constancy of the speed of light in each frame of reference logically results in compound light speeds (c+v)(c-v) for all frames in uniform motion relative to an observer. This is the de facto<\/em> explanation for the Sagnac effect. No other is required.<\/p>\n

The logic is as follows: If, according to the Michelson-Morley experiments and Galilean relativity, the speed of light is constant at [c] in each frame of reference,
\n1. Light must travel a distance d = (c+v) in time t or (c-v)t in the opposite direction in the moving frame as measured in the reference frame of a „fixed“ observer, or,
\n2. Space (or a combination of space-time) must contract in the direction of motion, or contrary to relativistic doctrine, expand in the case where the light wave is opposite to the direction of motion,<\/strong> by the value, [vt]. (Regarding ring lasers, the distance (d) is fixed at 2?R and the time taken is t1<\/sub> = d\/(c-v) and t2<\/sub> = d\/(c+v) respectively. The difference, t1<\/sub> – t2<\/sub> = 2dv\/c2<\/sup> – v2<\/sup>)\n<\/p>\n

Relativists will claim the Sagnac effect is valid in relativity, thereby sanctioning the precise opposite of what the theory was to achieve, which is a single wave front common to both observers!<\/strong> A moment’s reflection will convince you that without this objective, the theory is redundant. (see Relativistic Kinematics<\/span>)<\/a><\/p>\n

An interesting and equally logical result of the Michelson-Morley experiment is the negation of a universal aether for light propagation in favour of a continuum specific to each frame of reference (see The Nature of Light<\/span><\/a>).<\/p>\n

Furthermore, early spectrometric experiments with particle trajectories in magnetic fields led to the erroneous conclusion that mass increased with velocity. The velocity is the resultant effect of an impulse and cannot in any way be considered a cause. Although induced fields opposing the initial field had been know from the time of Faraday, this explanation was completely ignored. A detailed assessment of the equations of relativity identifies this to be the reason and no change in mass is evident. There are no partial electrons. (See Relativistic Dynamics<\/span><\/a>)<\/p>\n

(Zitatende) <\/strong><\/p>\n

Lesen Sie bitte hier<\/span><\/a><\/strong> weiter!<\/p>\n

Beste Gr\u00fc\u00dfe Ekkehard Friebe<\/span><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Nachstehend bringe ich einen weiteren Beitrag von Walter Babin: Zitat: Special Relativity and the Sagnac Effect Copyright \u00a9 Walter Babin, Update Sept. 10, 2002 The constancy of the speed of light in each frame of reference logically results in compound light speeds (c+v)(c-v) for all frames in uniform motion relative to an observer. This is […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2650","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-englischsprachige-kritik-der-relativitatstheorie"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2650"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2650"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2650\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2650"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2650"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2650"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}