{"id":2647,"date":"2009-10-28T03:35:42","date_gmt":"2009-10-28T02:35:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/?p=2647"},"modified":"2013-01-22T08:17:44","modified_gmt":"2013-01-22T07:17:44","slug":"dr-louis-essen-relativity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/dr-louis-essen-relativity\/","title":{"rendered":"Dr. Louis Essen: „Relativity“"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ich nehme Bezug auf eine Arbeit in diesem Blog von Dr. Louis Essen, D.Sc., F.R.S.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/strong> unter dem Titel Relativit\u00e4tstheorie \u2013 Scherz oder Schwindel?<\/span><\/a> oder RELATIVITY \u2013 joke or swindle?<\/span><\/a>. Heute bringe ich eine andere Ver\u00f6ffentlichung von Dr. Essen, welche die katastrophale Situation im Bereich der Theoretischen Physik besonders anschaulich beleuchtet.<\/p>\n

Zitat: <\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

Relativity
\n<\/strong>Einstein\u2019s theory of relativity was dealt with very briefly in my university course but we were told that we must not expect to understand it. I accepted this situation and I have since discovered that most physicists are content to remain in the same position assuming that it must be right because it is generally accepted. My doubts about it arose when I found that the experts did not understand either. An exchange of letters in Nature<\/em> between Dingle and McCrea showed that they had opposite views about some of the predictions of the theory and the arguments advanced on both sides were in my view illogical and unconvincing. Much of the discussion about the theory was concerned with the readings of clocks when they are moving relatively to each other, and since I had a wide experience of comparing clocks and measuring time it seemed to be almost a duty to take a closer interest in the controversy especially as some of the so-called relativity effects although very small were not becoming significant in the definition of the atomic second and the use of atomic clocks.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n

It is always better to refer to the original papers rather than to second hand accounts and I, therefore, studied Einstein\u2019s famous paper, often regarded as one of he most important contributions in the history of science. Imagine my surprise when I found that it was in some respects one of the worse papers I had ever read. The terminology and style were unscientific and ambiguous; one of his assumptions is given on different pages in two contradictory forms, some of his statements were open to different interpretations and the worst fault in my view, was the use of thought-experiments. This practice is contrary to the scientific method which is based on conclusions drawn from the results of actual experiments. My first thoughts were, that in spite of its obvious faults of presentation, the theory must be basically sound, and before committing my criticisms to print I read widely round the subject. The additional reading only confirmed my belief that the theory was marred by its own internal contradictions. Relativitists often state that the theory is accepted by all scientists of repute but this is quite untrue. It has been strongly criticised by many scientists, including at least one Nobel prize winner. Most of the criticisms are of a general nature drawing attention to its many contradictions, so I decided to pin-point the errors which give rise to the contradictions, giving the page and line in Einstein\u2019s paper, thus making it difficult for relativitists to dodge them and obscure them in a morass of irrational discussion.<\/p>\n

(Zitatende) <\/strong><\/p>\n

Lesen Sie bitte hier<\/span><\/strong> <\/a>weiter!<\/p>\n

Beste Gr\u00fc\u00dfe Ekkehard Friebe<\/span><\/a>\u00a0\u00a0 <\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ich nehme Bezug auf eine Arbeit in diesem Blog von Dr. Louis Essen, D.Sc., F.R.S.\u00a0 unter dem Titel Relativit\u00e4tstheorie \u2013 Scherz oder Schwindel? oder RELATIVITY \u2013 joke or swindle?. Heute bringe ich eine andere Ver\u00f6ffentlichung von Dr. Essen, welche die katastrophale Situation im Bereich der Theoretischen Physik besonders anschaulich beleuchtet. Zitat: Relativity Einstein\u2019s theory of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2647","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-englischsprachige-kritik-der-relativitatstheorie"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2647"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2647"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2647\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2647"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2647"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2647"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}