{"id":2416,"date":"2009-08-09T10:33:03","date_gmt":"2009-08-09T09:33:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/?p=2416"},"modified":"2009-08-11T11:23:48","modified_gmt":"2009-08-11T10:23:48","slug":"chapter-4-interferometric-experiments-on-the-speed-of-light-from-moving-sources","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/chapter-4-interferometric-experiments-on-the-speed-of-light-from-moving-sources\/","title":{"rendered":"Chapter 4: INTERFEROMETRIC EXPERIMENTS ON THE SPEED OF LIGHT FROM MOVING SOURCES"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ich bringe jetzt eine Textprobe von Kapitel 4 (Chapter 4) aus dem Buch von
\nProfessor Wallace Kantor \u201eRelativistic Propagation of Light<\/span><\/a>„: <\/strong>\n<\/p>\n

Zitat: <\/strong><\/p>\n

Chapter 4: <\/strong>INTERFEROMETRIC EXPERIMENTS ON THE SPEED OF LIGHT FROM MOVING SOURCES<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Lloyd mirror interferometric experiments, by Tolman in 1910 and by Beckmann and Mandics in 1964, on the speed of light from a moving source are shown to be unproductive of conclusive results. The related Rotz experiment in 1963 with moving slits is inconclusive since no experimental knowledge of the effect of slits on the speed of light is known.<\/p>\n

The four closed-path interferometric experiments on the speed of light from moving reflecting and transmitting secondary sources are evaluated. The negative results obtained in three of them are shown to be due to a failure to correctly adjust and maintain adjustment of the interferometer at the optimum condition for the detection of a fringe shift. These three experiments are inconclusive rather than a confirmation of the Einstein absolute speed of light postulate. The qualita<\/em>tive <\/em>„yes or no“ experimental results reported by the author in 1962 still remain as an undiscredited contradiction of Einstein’s second postulate on the absolute <\/em>speed of light.<\/p>\n

Most physicists, and others, have had it drummed into them that the famous Michelson-Morley interferometric experiment, intended to detect motion through the ether, is also an experimental confirmation of Einstein’s second postulate on the absolute speed of light from a moving <\/em>source, <\/em>albeit that the source in the Michelson-Morley work was stationary. This point of view has been received as an awesome piety that must not be questioned.<\/p>\n

The experiment and its many repetitions have shown no detectable motion through an ether. It is, therefore, rather conclusive that there is no detectable ether attendant on motion. In the absence of an ether, the Michelson-Morley experiment would clearly be expected to yield nothing but <\/em>a trivial null result; the light rays emitted from the stationary source <\/em>in the experiment propagate with equal speed, in each direction, along each perpendicular arm of the interferometer. Only if the light source is in motion relative to the interferometer can the interferometric type of experiment, with certain careful precautions, provide a direct test of Einstein’s postulate of absolutivity.<\/p>\n

(Zitatende) <\/strong><\/p>\n

Lesen Sie bitte hier<\/span><\/a><\/strong> weiter!<\/p>\n

Beste Gr\u00fc\u00dfe Ekkehard Friebe<\/span><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ich bringe jetzt eine Textprobe von Kapitel 4 (Chapter 4) aus dem Buch von Professor Wallace Kantor \u201eRelativistic Propagation of Light„: Zitat: Chapter 4: INTERFEROMETRIC EXPERIMENTS ON THE SPEED OF LIGHT FROM MOVING SOURCES The Lloyd mirror interferometric experiments, by Tolman in 1910 and by Beckmann and Mandics in 1964, on the speed of light […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2416","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-englischsprachige-kritik-der-relativitatstheorie"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2416"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2416"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2416\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2416"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2416"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2416"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}