{"id":2362,"date":"2009-08-05T07:03:06","date_gmt":"2009-08-05T06:03:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/?p=2362"},"modified":"2009-08-11T19:29:18","modified_gmt":"2009-08-11T18:29:18","slug":"chapter-1-relativistic-absolutivity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/chapter-1-relativistic-absolutivity\/","title":{"rendered":"Chapter 1: RELATIVISTIC ABSOLUTIVITY"},"content":{"rendered":"

Es folgt nun das Erste Kapitel (Chapter 1) aus dem Buch von
\nProfessor Wallace Kantor: \u201eRelativistic Propagation of Light“:<\/span><\/a><\/strong>\n<\/p>\n

Zitat: <\/strong><\/p>\n

Chapter 1: RELATIVISTIC ABSOLUTIVITY<\/strong><\/p>\n

The self-contradiction in the title of this chapter directs attention to the theme of the entire book: Einstein’s special theory of relativity, based on the Lorentz transformations, is founded, as first observed by Einstein himself, on two „apparently irreconcilable“ postulates — relative<\/em> uniform rectilinear motion and the absolute<\/em> velocity of light emitted by moving sources. The hypothesis of the absolute velocity of light is in fact, on the basis of current experimental evidence, absolutely irreconcilable with the concept of relative motion.<\/p>\n

About sixty experiments associated with the kinematics<\/em> of the Lorentz transformations and the Einstein special theory of relativity are critically examined in this book.<\/p>\n

Contrary to current consensus there are no experiments in kinematics<\/em> that unequivocally confirm the Lorentz transformations or the Einstein special theory of relativity. It will come as a further surprise, initially sorely taxing the credulity of most physicists, that there are, instead, five different types of experiments that flatly contradict, both qualitatively and quantitatively, the kinematic<\/em> consequences of the Lorentz transformations and the Einstein special theory of relativity.<\/p>\n

The wide acceptance of the physical validity of the Lorentz transformations stems also from their application in the dynamics of atomic and nuclear physics, even though kinematics is more fundamental than dynamics. The basis of the dynamics lies in the definitional nature of the concept of velocity-dependent mass. The concept follows as a consequence of the imposition of mathematical form invariance or Lorentz covariance. It has been shown that the specific direct experimental evidence on velocity-dependent mass can be equally well explained (see Chapter 8, p. 143) without ever mentioning the concept of velocity-dependent mass. The experimental evidence on the concept of variable mass is, therefore, not discriminatory in unique favor of Einstein’s theory.<\/p>\n

The nominal leadership of the society of physicists is so strongly committed to a mistaken and unsupported belief<\/em> in the physical validity of the Einstein special theory of relativity that explicit publication of the contradictory experimental results, in the respected physics journals, has been very effectively suppressed. It is the primary task of this monograph to present, out in the open,<\/em> this shockingly arresting evidence. No new theory is presented.<\/p>\n

The suppression of contrary ideas by the establishment is a well chronicled historical fact that hardly needs reiteration by fresh examples of the autocratic and capricious means of its accomplishment. The suppression of specific experimental results and critiques, not in harmony with establishment beliefs, is a particularly grave situation for the very survival, much less any progress, of physical science.<\/p>\n

(Zitatende) <\/strong><\/p>\n

Lesen Sie bitte hier<\/span><\/a><\/strong> weiter!<\/p>\n

Beste Gr\u00fc\u00dfe Ekkehard Friebe<\/span><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Es folgt nun das Erste Kapitel (Chapter 1) aus dem Buch von Professor Wallace Kantor: \u201eRelativistic Propagation of Light“: Zitat: Chapter 1: RELATIVISTIC ABSOLUTIVITY The self-contradiction in the title of this chapter directs attention to the theme of the entire book: Einstein’s special theory of relativity, based on the Lorentz transformations, is founded, as first […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2362","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-englischsprachige-kritik-der-relativitatstheorie"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2362"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2362"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2362\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2362"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2362"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2362"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}