{"id":1219,"date":"2009-03-03T15:58:33","date_gmt":"2009-03-03T14:58:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/?p=1219"},"modified":"2009-03-03T16:11:08","modified_gmt":"2009-03-03T15:11:08","slug":"special-relativity-arising-from-a-misunderstanding-of-experimental-results-on-the-constant-speed-of-light","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/special-relativity-arising-from-a-misunderstanding-of-experimental-results-on-the-constant-speed-of-light\/","title":{"rendered":"Special relativity arising from a misunderstanding of experimental results on the constant speed of light"},"content":{"rendered":"
Nachstehend bringe ich einen Beitrag von Professor Zifeng Li<\/span><\/strong><\/a>\u00a0<\/strong>in der Zeitschrift PHYSICS ESSAYS<\/span><\/a><\/strong> <\/span>21, 2 (2008), pp. 96 – 102, unter dem Titel:<\/div>\n
Special relativity arising from a misunderstanding of experimental results on the constant speed of light<\/span><\/a><\/strong><\/div>\n

\u00a0Zifeng Li
\nYanshan<\/em> <\/em>University<\/em>, <\/em>Qinhuangdao<\/em>, <\/em>Hebei<\/em> 066004, <\/em>China<\/em>
\n(R<\/em>eceived 4 January 2006; accepted 2 April 2008)\u00a0<\/p>\n

Zitat:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Abstract: <\/strong>All experiments show that the speed of light relative to its source measured in vacuum is constant. Einstein interpreted this fact such that any ray of light moves in the „stationary“ system with a fixed velocity c<\/em>, whether the ray is emitted by a stationary or by a moving body, and established special relativity accordingly. This paper reviews basic hypotheses and viewpoints of space-time relationship in special relativity; analyzes derivation processes and the mistakes in the Lorentz transformation and Einstein’s original paper. The transformation between two coordinate systems moving uniformly relative to one another is established. It is shown that special relativity based upon the Lorentz transformation is not correct, and that the relative speed between two objects can be faster than the speed of light. \u00a9 2008 Physics Essays Publication<\/em>. [DOI: 10.4006\/1.3006345]<\/p>\n

R\u00e9sum\u00e9: <\/strong>Toutes les exp\u00e9rimentations montrent que la vitesse de lumi\u00e8re relative \u00e0 sa source mesur\u00e9e dans le vacuum est constante. A propos de ce fait, Einstein expliquait que n’importe quel rayon de lumi\u00e8re se d\u00e9place dans le syst\u00e8me „stationnaire“ avec une v\u00e9locit\u00e9 fixe c<\/em>, que le rayon soit \u00e9mis par un corps stationnaire ou mobile, et il a donc \u00e9tabli la relativit\u00e9 restreinte. Cet article r\u00e9examine les hypoth\u00e8ses et les points de vue fondamentaux de la relation espace-temps dans la relativit\u00e9 restreinte; analyse les proc\u00e9ds de d\u00e9rivation et les erreurs dans la transformation de Lorentz et l’article original d’Einstein. La transformation entre deux syst\u00e8mes de coordonn\u00e9es qui se d\u00e9placent uniformement relativement \u00e0un un autre est \u00e9tablie. Il est montr\u00e9 que la relativit\u00e9 restreinte bas\u00e9e sur la transformation de Lorentz n’est pas correcte, et que la vitesse relative entre deux objets peut \u00eatre plus grande que celle de lumi\u00e8re.<\/p>\n

Key words:<\/strong> Special Relativity; Light Speed; Einstein; Lorentz Transformation.<\/p>\n


\nI. INTRODUCTION\u00a0<\/strong>Special relativity was established by Einstein nearly a century ago [1] and today has become a compulsory course at many universities [2]. However, the rationality of its derivation process and its conclusions are still under suspicion. [3-28]\u00a0<\/div>\n

This paper briefly reviews the basic hypotheses and the main viewpoints of space-time in special relativity. The derivations and the mistakes involved in the Lorentz transformation and Einstein’s original paper are analyzed. The transformation between two coordinate systems moving uniformly relative to one another will be revised. It will be shown that special relativity based upon the Lorentz transformation is not correct, and that the relative speed between two objects can be faster than the speed of light.<\/p>\n

[ . . . . . . . . . . . ]<\/p>\n

C<\/strong>. Key points of special relativity\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0Based on the Lorentz transformation, special relativity concluded that:
\n(1) Simultaneity effect: if two events appear at two points in a coordinate system at rest synchronously, the times that these two events appear in another coordinate system moving uniformly are not the same.
\n(2) Length contraction effect: in a coordinate system with a relative speed, the length of an object measured along the speed direction of the system is shorter than that measured in another coordinate system in which the object is at rest.
\n(3) Time dilation effect: for an event, the time measured in a coordinate system with relative speed to the place is longer than that measured in another coordinate system in which the place is at rest.\u00a0<\/p>\n

D. Dynamics of special relativity\u00a0
\n<\/strong>(1) The mass of an object measured in a moving coordinate system is larger than that measured in the coordinate system in which the object is at rest.
\n(2) The energy of an object equals its mass multiplied by the square of the speed of light.\u00a0<\/p>\n

III. SOME MISTAKES IN SPECIAL RELATIVITY\u00a0<\/p>\n

A. Wrong comprehension of experimental results on the constant speed of light\u00a0
\n<\/strong>
\nUntil now, all experiments show that the speed of light relative to its source measured in vacuum is constant. This can be explained as follows.\u00a0
\n(1) For light signals in vacuum radiated from sources that are fixed in any inertial coordinate system, measured speeds of these light signals relative to their sources (or coordinate systems), respectively, are equal.
\n(2) For light signals in vacuum radiated from a definite source, light speeds relative to their source measured in coordinate systems moving uniformly relative to one another are equal.\u00a0<\/p>\n

[ . . . . . . . . . . . ]<\/p>\n

C. Deductions
\n<\/strong>Special relativity based upon the Lorentz transformation is not correct. As the key components of special relativity, the simultaneity effect, length contraction effect, time dilation effect, mass increasing effect, and the question of restenergy are all groundless. The relative speed between two objects can exceed the light speed.<\/div>\n

VI. CONCLUSIONS\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

(1) Special relativity is derived from a misunderstanding of experimental results involving the constant speed of light.
\n(2) Special relativity based upon the Lorentz transformation is not correct.
\n(3) Descriptions of a definite event in all inertial coordinate systems moving uniformly relative to one another are equal.
\n(4) The relative speed between two objects can exceed the light speed.
\n(5) Einstein’s paper „On the electrodynamics of moving bodies“ is full of mistakes and conflicts.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS\u00a0<\/strong>\u00a0<\/div>\n
\n

The author gratefully acknowledges Dr. Thomas Smid for polishing this paper’s English and discussions.\u00a0<\/em><\/div>\n

1\u00a0 A. Einstein, „On the electrodynamics of moving bodies,“ The Principle of\u00a0 <\/em>Relativity (<\/em>Methuen and Company, London, 1923).<\/p>\n

2\u00a0 C. Shuozhu and J. Zhiyong, General Physics (<\/em>People’s Education Press, Beijing, 1978), pp. 231-254 (in Chinese).<\/p>\n

3\u00a0 Al. Kelly, „Special relativity-Right or wrong?“ Electron. World 106 (<\/strong>1773), 722 (2000).<\/p>\n

4\u00a0 Z. Yin, „Investigation of special relativity and an alternative explanation of the speed of light,“ Phys. Essays 15 (<\/strong>4), 363 (2002).<\/p>\n

5\u00a0 E. Bitsakis, „Space and time: the ongoing quest,“ Found. Phys. 35 (<\/strong>1), 57 (2005).<\/p>\n

6\u00a0 G. O. Mueller and K. Kneckebrodt, „95 years of criticism of the special theory of relativity (1908 – 2003),“ (Germany, 2006).<\/span><\/p>\n

7\u00a0 C. M. Will, „Was Einstein right?“ Ann. Phys. 15 (<\/strong>1-2), 19 (2006).<\/p>\n

8\u00a0 B. T. H. Varcoe, „Testing special relativity using slow light,“ Contemp. Phys. 47 (<\/strong>1), 25 (2006).<\/p>\n

9\u00a0 S. Xu, „The mathematic basis of relativity is wrong,“ Invention and Innovation (1), 32 (2001)\u00a0\u00a0(in Chinese).<\/p>\n

10\u00a0 S. Xu, „To look at scientific platform, new events happen in China,“ Invention and Innovation (2), 34 (2001)\u00a0\u00a0(in Chinese).<\/p>\n

11\u00a0 S. Xu, „Misunderstandings on mass-energy relations,“ Invention and Innovation (2), 32 (2002)\u00a0\u00a0(in Chinese).<\/p>\n

12\u00a0 S. Xu and Q. Xiang, „Generalized relativity is so different from science,“ Invention and Innovation (3), 30-31 (2002)\u00a0\u00a0(in Chinese).<\/p>\n

13\u00a0 R. Xu, „SR goes against factuality principles,“ Invention and Innovation (10), 32 (2002)\u00a0\u00a0(in Chinese).<\/p>\n

14\u00a0 J. Zhu, „Discussing the fundament of the experiment about special relativity,“ J. Shanghai University of Electric Power 19 (<\/strong>3), 57 (2003)\u00a0\u00a0(in Chinese).<\/p>\n

15\u00a0 J. Cui, „On China’s own innovation way-Impressions of reading ‚Rethought on relativity,'“ Invention and Innovation (3), 34 (2003)\u00a0\u00a0(in Chinese).<\/p>\n

16\u00a0 Y. Lei, „Criticizing voice on relativity is worth analyzing in two ways-the first impression of ‚Rethought on relativity,'“ Invention and Innovation (3), 37 (2003)\u00a0\u00a0(in Chinese).<\/p>\n

17\u00a0 Z. Huang, „Theoretical development and experimental examinations in special relativity,“ Eng. Sci. 5 (<\/strong>5), 8 (2003)\u00a0\u00a0(in Chinese).<\/p>\n

18\u00a0 D. Liu, „A debate between relativity and the concept of classics‘ spacetime & matter,“ Invention and Innovation (9), 36 (2003)\u00a0\u00a0(in Chinese).<\/p>\n

19\u00a0 Q. Xiang, „Do away with superstitious and read relativity cautiously,“ Invention and Innovation (10), 36 (2003)\u00a0\u00a0(in Chinese).<\/p>\n

20\u00a0 D. Liu, „Making zero divisor is a math’s mistake,“ Invention and Innovation (10), 37 (2003)\u00a0\u00a0(in Chinese).<\/p>\n

21\u00a0 D. Huang, On the Essence of Physical Phenomenon-Matter Effect Study <\/em>Challenges Relativity (<\/em>Shanxi Science and Technology Publishing House, Xi’An, 2001)\u00a0\u00a0(in Chinese).<\/p>\n

22\u00a0 Z. Song, D. Fan, S. Xu, and J. Hao, Rethinking on Relativity (<\/em>Earthquake Publishing House, Beijing, 2001)\u00a0\u00a0(in Chinese).<\/p>\n

23\u00a0 J. Qi, New Physics (<\/em>Publishing House of Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, 2003)\u00a0\u00a0(in Chinese).<\/p>\n

24\u00a0 Z. Li, T. Li, C. Wang, Z. Wang, and X. Tian, „The essence of special relativity and its influence on science, philosophy & society,“ Scientific Inquiry 8 (<\/strong>2), 229236 (2007).<\/p>\n

25\u00a0 Z. Li and Z. Wang, „Materialistic views of space-time and mass-energy,“ Scientific Inquiry 8 (<\/strong>2), 237 (2007).<\/p>\n

26\u00a0 Z. Li, „Moving objects observation theory in place of special relativity,“ Scientific Inquiry 8 (<\/strong>2), 242 (2007).<\/p>\n

27\u00a0 Z. Li and X. Tian,“Magic weapons for supporting relativity,“ Scientific Inquiry 8 (<\/strong>2), 250 (2007).<\/p>\n

28\u00a0 . Li, „The essential relationship between mass and energy,“ Scientific Inquiry 8 (<\/strong>2), 256 (2007).<\/p>\n

(Zitatende)<\/p>\n

<\/strong>Leen Sie bitte hier<\/span><\/a><\/strong> weiter!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Nachstehend bringe ich einen Beitrag von Professor Zifeng Li\u00a0in der Zeitschrift PHYSICS ESSAYS 21, 2 (2008), pp. 96 – 102, unter dem Titel: Special relativity arising from a misunderstanding of experimental results on the constant speed of light \u00a0Zifeng Li Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, Hebei 066004, China (Received 4 January 2006; accepted 2 April 2008)\u00a0 Zitat: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1219","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-englischsprachige-kritik-der-relativitatstheorie"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1219"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1219"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1219\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1219"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1219"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekkehard-friebe.de\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1219"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}