By Marvin E. Kirsh
The California State University Los Angeles Department of Anthropology
Abstract
The theory of relativity (1) is considered form a perspective of folklore. Abstracted entities in the theory of relativity are stripped of units in order to provide explanation, to expose an ordinary meaning that employs a fulcrum for visual description.
It is suggested that components of the theory’s construction are not only unusually compatible with religious and spiritual but are also unaccounted for scientifically; they may not render the expected power struggle of church doctrine with scientific notions but an opposite situation in which logical contradiction at the root level of physical meaning and symbolism is absent and might exist only with respect to active perceptual structuring, either functioning on the unknown or belief.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
Wie bereits im Artikel Hundert Autoren fragen Einstein mitgeteilt, hat die Natural Philosophy Alliance (NPA) aus den USA anläßlich des 100-jährigen Jubiläums 2011 des berühmten Zwillingsparadoxons aus der Speziellen Relativitätstheorie Albert Einsteins, einen Offenen Brief an die wissenschaftliche Gemeinde gerichtet mit dem Ziel, eine einheitliche Lösung dieses Paradoxons unter den vielen widersprüchlichen Auffassungen, die vertreten und gelehrt werden, herauszufinden. Diese Aktion wurde zum heutigen Datum von ca. 140 Unterzeichnern aus der ganzen Welt unterstützt: http://twinparadox.net/
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
By © Our Pal Asija 2009
Special Relativity Theory versus Science Reality and Truth (SRT v/s SRT)
From Aristotle to Einstein Even To Date Same Folly Rules the Paradigm of Special Relativity
This paper and concomitant presentation trace the errors in special relativity to Aristotle more than two millennia ago and how with an unintended boost from an Icon of Science Einstein himself, the paradigm that rules physics and indeed all science has been corrupted, which main stream science continues to follow blindly and even worship Einstein for it as a gesture of gratitude. How could the great scientist make such an error and why scientists still not have been able to fix it is an ever perplexing and baffling mystery, which I will try to demystify.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
By Thomas E. Phipps, Jr., U.S.A.
To Seek the Truth in the Face of Authority: The Work of R.A. Waldron (1990)
Editor’s note: Richard A. Waldron passed away in Northern Ireland on May 24 of this year, shortly before he was to retire from the University of Ulster. Just prior to his death, Professor Waldron had agreed to join the editorial board of APEIRON, and contributed an article on stellar collapse which he eagerly looked forward to seeing published in this journal (see page 4).
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
von Jörg Djuren
Physik als anarchistische Textpraxis
Das Semiotische in den mathematisch – physikalischen Wissenschaften
Jörg Djuren
Verlag Graswurzelrevolution e.V.
Hannover 2002
ISBN: 3-9806353-9-2
Informationen zum Buch – Link –
Das Buch als PDF (ca. 1200 KB) – kostenfrei
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
By Ian McCausland
Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G4
Keywords: Einstein—relativity—history of science
Abstract
Albert Einstein’s scientific career is studied, with the purpose of trying to explain why he became such a universally famous and revered person.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
By Bruce Harvey
Relativity: Fact and Fiction
A causal theory of Special Relativity based on the work of Lorentz and Poincaré
Abstract
We examine the two theories of Lorentz-Poincaré relativity and Einstein’s special relativity. One a causal theory based on Maxwell’s Equations, the other pure mathematics derived from a philosophical assumption.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
By Prof. Dr. Rati Ram Sharma
ERRORS OF MODERN PHYSICS THEORIES
(Last revised 24 November 2001)
Copyright by the author Prof. Dr. Rati Ram Sharma- all rights reserved.
This article brings out the unrealities, flaws, inadequacies and shortcomings of the major current theories of Physics and Cosmology to justify formulation of the newly proposed Unified Physical Theory (UPT) as the way out.
Den ganzen Beitrag lesen »
By John-Erik Persson
KeyWords: Relativity, stellar aberration, Sagnac effect, gravitation, ether.
amazon
Description
The book gives a simple explanation to, and history of, Einstein’s theory. Many errors in the interpretations of the basic phenomena are explained. An alternative theory is presented. The wave model explains light and the particle model explains gravity. The wave or particle confusion is solved.
This book demonstrates that many of the physical phenomena behind Einstein’s theory have alternative interpretations. New ideas regarding light and old ideas regarding ether indicate a way out of the wave or particle confusion and allow absolute space and absolute, universal time.
Siehe auch vom gleichen Autor in diesem Blog:
"Illusions and Reality in Relativity"
-
Wie bereits im Artikel Hundert Autoren fragen Einstein mitgeteilt, hat die Natural Philosophy Alliance (NPA) aus den USA anläßlich des 100-jährigen Jubiläums 2011 des berühmten Zwillingsparadoxons aus der Speziellen Relativitätstheorie Albert Einsteins, einen Offenen Brief an die wissenschaftliche Gemeinde gerichtet mit dem Ziel, eine einheitliche Lösung dieses Paradoxons unter den vielen widersprüchlichen Auffassungen, die vertreten und gelehrt werden, herauszufinden. Diese Aktion wurde zum heutigen Datum von 137 Unterzeichnern aus der ganzen Welt unterstützt: http://twinparadox.net/
Die Initiatoren dieses Projekts haben jetzt einen Bericht über die bisherigen Ergebnisse dieser internationalen Umfrage online gestellt, siehe den gelb hinterlegten Text im Offenen Brief an die Physik-Gemeinde:
Epilogue – Results, Summary, Conclusion
Über weitere Entwicklungen des Projekts werden wir auf dem Laufenden gehalten.